ArticleMedicine2020
Effectiveness of advanced nursing care (ANC) on bone cancer pain, psychological disorders and quality of life in patients with primary bone cancers: A protocol for a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline and Implementation of Osteosarcoma Nursing Care for Children and Adolescents.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced nursing care (ANC) has been reported to effectively relieve bone cancer pain, prevent psychological disorders and improve the quality of life (QoL) in patients with primary bone cancers (PBC) during the treatment. However, the exact effect of ANC remains controversial. This systematic review will aimed to assess the effectiveness of ANC on bone cancer pain, psychological disorders and QoL in patients with PBC.
methodsEligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality prospective cohort studies were searched from Excerpt Medica Database (Embase), PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science (WOS), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Bio Medical Database (CBM), China Scientific Journal Database (CSJD), and Wanfang Database. Papers in English or Chinese published from January 2000 to July 2020 will be included without any restrictions. The clinical outcomes including bone cancer pain, psychological disorders, QoL, and adverse events of ANC in patients with PBC were systematically evaluated.Two reviewers will separately carry out study selection and data extraction. Stata 14.0 and Review Manager 5.3 were used for data analysis. Methodological quality for each eligible clinical trial will be assessed by using Cochrane risk of bias tool. Subgroup and meta-regression analysis will be carried out depending on the availability of sufficient data.
resultsThis study will comprehensively summarize all potential evidence to systematically investigate the effects and safety of ANC on bone cancer pain, psychological disorders and QoL in patients with PBC.
conclusionThe findings of this study will help to determine whether ANC is effective or not on bone cancer pain, psychological disorders and QoL in patients with PBC. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202090037.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.