SynthesisMedicine2020
The efficacy of gefitinib supplementation for breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocrine therapy reprogramming of breast cancer facilitates metastatic escape via upregulation of P-Rex1/Rac1 signalling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- EGFR-Mutant Urothelial Carcinoma Harboring an Ala750_Ile759delinsGlyGly Alteration with a Primary Resistance to Polychemotherapy and a Sensitivity to Osimertinib: A Literature Review on EGFR Alterations and Response to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancers.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Identification and validation of a copper homeostasis-related gene signature for the predicting prognosis of breast cancer patients via integrated bioinformatics analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Busting the Breast Cancer with AstraZeneca's Gefitinib.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe efficacy of gefitinib supplementation for breast cancer remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of gefitinib supplementation vs placebo on the efficacy of breast cancer.
methodsWe have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through February 2019 and included randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of gefitinib supplementation vs placebo on overall response for breast cancer patients. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model.
resultsSeven randomized controlled trials involving 927 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for breast cancer, gefitinib supplementation revealed no obvious impact on complete response (risk ration [RR] = 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58 to 2.44; P = .63), progressive disease (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.59-1.11; P = .18), partial response (RR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.36-1.25; P = .21), stable disease (RR = 1.02; 95% CI = 0.65-1.60; P = .92), nausea or vomiting (RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.73-1.33; P = .93), but was associated with increased incidence of diarrhea (RR = 2.80; 95% CI = 2.23-3.52; P < .00001), decreased incidence of hot flash (RR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.37-0.78; P = .001), and improved incidence of adverse events (RR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.05-1.19; P = .0006).
conclusionsGefitinib supplementation may provide no positive effect on complete response, progressive disease, partial response or stable disease for breast cancer patients, but with the increase in adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.