ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2020
Comparison of deep learning synthesis of synthetic CTs using clinical MRI inputs.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep learning in MRI-guided radiation therapy: A systematic review.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Pooled it
- A systematic literature review: deep learning techniques for synthetic medical image generation and their applications in radiotherapy.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Pooled it
- Adoption of Hybrid MRI-Linac Systems for the Treatment of Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review of the Current Literature Regarding Clinical and Technical Features.Technology in cancer research & treatmentPooled it
- Generative Models for Medical Image Creation and Translation: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical validation of MR-generated synthetic CT by MRCAT for brain tumor radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Synthetic CT generation based on multi-sequence MR using CycleGAN for head and neck MRI-only planning.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- RobMedNAS: searching robust neural network architectures for medical image synthesis.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2024Article
- Deep-Learning-Aided Evaluation of Spondylolysis Imaged with Ultrashort Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- CBCT-based synthetic CT generated using CycleGAN with HU correction for adaptive radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Deep learning synthesis of cone-beam computed tomography from zero echo time magnetic resonance imaging.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Sex Disparities of the Sacroiliac Joint: Focus on Joint Anatomy and Imaging Appearance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Application of artificial intelligence in brain molecular imaging.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2022Review
- Prediction of an oxygen extraction fraction map by convolutional neural network: validation of input data among MR and PET images.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There has been substantial interest in developing techniques for synthesizing CT-like images from MRI inputs, with important applications in simultaneous PET/MR and radiotherapy planning. Deep learning has recently shown great potential for solving this problem. The goal of this research was to investigate the capability of four common clinical MRI sequences (T1-weighted gradient-echo [T1], T2-weighted fat-suppressed fast spin-echo [T2-FatSat], post-contrast T1-weighted gradient-echo [T1-Post], and fast spin-echo T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [CUBE-FLAIR]) as inputs into a deep CT synthesis pipeline. Data were obtained retrospectively in 92 subjects who had undergone an MRI and CT scan on the same day. The patient's MR and CT scans were registered to one another using affine registration. The deep learning model was a convolutional neural network encoder-decoder with skip connections similar to the U-net architecture and Inception V3 inspired blocks instead of sequential convolution blocks. After training with 150 epochs and a batch size of 6, the model was evaluated using structural similarity index (SSIM), peak SNR (PSNR), mean absolute error (MAE), and dice coefficient. We found that feasible results were attainable for each image type, and no single image type was superior for all analyses. The MAE (in HU) of the resulting synthesized CT in the whole brain was 51.236 ± 4.504 for CUBE-FLAIR, 45.432 ± 8.517 for T1, 44.558 ± 7.478 for T1-Post, and 45.721 ± 8.7767 for T2, showing not only feasible, but also very compelling results on clinical images. Deep learning-based synthesis of CT images from MRI is possible with a wide range of inputs, suggesting that viable images can be created from a wide range of clinical input types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.