Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33119615›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

G82S RAGE polymorphism influences amyloid-RAGE interactions relevant in Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Rani Cathrine C, Bincy Lukose, P Rani

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Modulation of Aging Diseases via RAGE Targets: A Dietary Intervention Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Modulating the RAGE-Induced Inflammatory Response: Peptoids as RAGE Antagonists.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Nanopore Sequencing ofACS omega · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rani Cathrine CDepartment of Biotechnology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Bincy LukoseDepartment of Biotechnology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
P RaniDepartment of Biotechnology, PSG College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8157-0456
PSG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED RESEARCH · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) has been implicated in the pathophysiology of Alzheimers disease(AD) due to its ability to bind amyloid-beta (Aβ42) and mediate inflammatory response. G82S RAGE polymorphism is associated with AD but the molecular mechanism for this association is not understood. Our previous in silico study indicated a higher binding affinity for mutated G82S RAGE, which could be caused due to changes in N linked glycosylation at residue N81. To confirm this hypothesis, in the present study molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to simulate the wild type (WT) and G82S glycosylated structures of RAGE to identify the global structural changes and to find the binding efficiency with Aβ42 peptide. Binding pocket analysis of the MD trajectory showed that cavity/binding pocket in mutant G82S glycosylated RAGE variants is more exposed and accessible to external ligands compared to WT RAGE, which can enhance the affinity of RAGE for Aβ. To validate the above concept, an in vitro binding study was carried using SHSY5Y cell line expressing recombinant WT and mutated RAGE variant individually to which HiLyte Fluor labeled Aβ42 was incubated at different concentrations. Saturated binding kinetics method was adopted to determine the Kd values for Aβ42 binding to RAGE. The Kd value for Aβ42- WT and Aβ42-mutant RAGE binding were 92±40 nM (95% CI-52 to 152nM; R2-0.92) and 45±20 nM (95% CI -29 to 64nM; R2-0.93), respectively. The Kd value of <100nM observed for both variants implicates RAGE as a high-affinity receptor for Aβ42 and mutant RAGE has higher affinity compared to WT. The alteration in binding affinity is responsible for activation of the inflammatory pathway as implicated by enhanced expression of TNFα and IL6 in mutant RAGE expressing cell line which gives a mechanistic view for the G82S RAGE association with AD.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAlzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntigens, NeoplasmBinding SitesCell LineCrystallography, X-RayGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGlycosylationHumansInterleukin-6Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesModels, MolecularMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntigens, NeoplasmIL6 protein, humanInterleukin-6Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesMOK protein, humanTNF protein, humanTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID33119615
PMCPMC7595441
OpenAlexW3096372759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.