Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33119609›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Impact of sars-cov-2 interventions on dengue transmission.

Jue Tao Lim, Borame Sue Lee Dickens, Lawrence Zheng Xiong Chew, Esther Li Wen Choo, Joel Ruihan Koo, Joel Aik, Lee Ching Ng, Alex R Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Updating the Insecticide Resistance Status ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jue Tao LimSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2245-0331
Borame Sue Lee DickensSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1592-1745
Lawrence Zheng Xiong ChewSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Esther Li Wen ChooSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.
Joel Ruihan KooSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9798-1751
Joel AikEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environmental Agency, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2851-9424
Lee Ching NgEnvironmental Health Institute, National Environmental Agency, Singapore.
Alex R CookSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated 105 million dengue infections occur per year across 120 countries, where traditional vector control is the primary control strategy to reduce contact between mosquito vectors and people. The ongoing sars-cov-2 pandemic has resulted in dramatic reductions in human mobility due to social distancing measures; the effects on vector-borne illnesses are not known. Here we examine the pre and post differences of dengue case counts in Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand, and estimate the effects of social distancing as a treatment effect whilst adjusting for temporal confounders. We found that social distancing is expected to lead to 4.32 additional cases per 100,000 individuals in Thailand per month, which equates to 170 more cases per month in the Bangkok province (95% CI: 100-242) and 2008 cases in the country as a whole (95% CI: 1170-2846). Social distancing policy estimates for Thailand were also found to be robust to model misspecification, and variable addition and omission. Conversely, no significant impact on dengue transmission was found in Singapore or Malaysia. Across country disparities in social distancing policy effects on reported dengue cases are reasoned to be driven by differences in workplace-residence structure, with an increase in transmission risk of arboviruses from social distancing primarily through heightened exposure to vectors in elevated time spent at residences, demonstrating the need to understand the effects of location on dengue transmission risk under novel population mixing conditions such as those under social distancing policies.

Indexed as

AnimalsBetacoronavirusCommunicable Disease ControlCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19DengueHumansMalaysiaMosquito VectorsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2SingaporeSocial IsolationThailand

Identifiers

PMID33119609
PMCPMC7595279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.