Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33119590›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Capture-based enrichment of Theileria parva DNA enables full genome assembly of first buffalo-derived strain and reveals exceptional intra-specific genetic diversity.

Nicholas C Palmateer, Kyle Tretina, Joshua Orvis, Olukemi O Ifeonu, Jonathan Crabtree, Elliott Drabék, Roger Pelle, Elias Awino, Hanzel T Gotia, James B Munro and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. South African Buffalo-DerivedFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  4. Antigenic Diversity inFrontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicholas C PalmateerInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4307-8049
Kyle TretinaInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1740-2730
Joshua OrvisInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5705-5710
Olukemi O IfeonuInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jonathan CrabtreeInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Elliott DrabékInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8799-1948
Roger PelleBiosciences eastern and central Africa-International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0003-1053-085X
Elias AwinoInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Hanzel T GotiaInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
James B MunroInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3067-6434
Luke TallonInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4656-4480
W Ivan MorrisonThe Roslin Institute, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, United Kingdom.
Claudia A DaubenbergerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Vish NeneInternational Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.
Donald P KnowlesDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-3166
Richard P BishopDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3720-9970
Joana C SilvaInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6502-7026
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USInternational Livestock Research Institute · KEWashington State University · USRoslin Institute · GBSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CH

Funding

Genome-wide sieve analysis and immunological validation to identify targets of protective efficacy in field trials of a whole-organism malaria vaccineR01AI141900 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CARNEIRO DA SILVA, JOANA · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
IMMUNITY AND INFECTIONT32AI007540 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KAPER, JAMES B · 1998 to 2018
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141900NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theileria parva is an economically important, intracellular, tick-transmitted parasite of cattle. A live vaccine against the parasite is effective against challenge from cattle-transmissible T. parva but not against genotypes originating from the African Cape buffalo, a major wildlife reservoir, prompting the need to characterize genome-wide variation within and between cattle- and buffalo-associated T. parva populations. Here, we describe a capture-based target enrichment approach that enables, for the first time, de novo assembly of nearly complete T. parva genomes derived from infected host cell lines. This approach has exceptionally high specificity and sensitivity and is successful for both cattle- and buffalo-derived T. parva parasites. De novo genome assemblies generated for cattle genotypes differ from the reference by ~54K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) throughout the 8.31 Mb genome, an average of 6.5 SNPs/kb. We report the first buffalo-derived T. parva genome, which is ~20 kb larger than the genome from the reference, cattle-derived, Muguga strain, and contains 25 new potential genes. The average non-synonymous nucleotide diversity (πN) per gene, between buffalo-derived T. parva and the Muguga strain, was 1.3%. This remarkably high level of genetic divergence is supported by an average Wright's fixation index (FST), genome-wide, of 0.44, reflecting a degree of genetic differentiation between cattle- and buffalo-derived T. parva parasites more commonly seen between, rather than within, species. These findings present clear implications for vaccine development, further demonstrated by the ability to assemble nearly all known antigens in the buffalo-derived strain, which will be critical in design of next generation vaccines. The DNA capture approach used provides a clear advantage in specificity over alternative T. parva DNA enrichment methods used previously, such as those that utilize schizont purification, is less labor intensive, and enables in-depth comparative genomics in this apicomplexan parasite.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAnimalsBuffaloesCattleDNA, ProtozoanGenome, ProtozoanGenotypeSpecies SpecificityTheileria parvaTheileriasisDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID33119590
PMCPMC7654785
OpenAlexW3096997956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.