Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33119445›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

Racial disparities in medication use: imperatives for managed care pharmacy.

Stephen J Kogut

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing the conversation: 30 years of scholarship in managed care pharmacy.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Delayed treatment initiation of oral anticoagulants among Medicare patients with atrial fibrillation.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  9. Cost sharing in managed care and the ethical question of business purpose.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Racial Disparities in Medication Use:Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen J KogutDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy, Kingston.
University of Rhode Island · US

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115677 · NIGMS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROUNDS, SHARON IRENE SMITH · 2016 to 2025
$45.0M
Project 4: Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS): Fetus to First YearsP20GM125507 · NIGMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 2018 to 2026
$23.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM125507NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115677
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic and the social unrest pervading U.S. cities in response to the killings of George Floyd and other Black citizens at the hands of police are historically significant. These events exemplify dismaying truths about race and equality in the United States. Racial health disparities are an inexcusable lesion on the U.S. health care system. Many health disparities involve medications, including antidepressants, anticoagulants, diabetes medications, drugs for dementia, and statins, to name a few. Managed care pharmacy has a role in perpetuating racial disparities in medication use. For example, pharmacy benefit designs are increasingly shifting costs of expensive medications to patients, creating affordability crises for lower income workers, who are disproportionally persons of color. In addition, the quest to maximize rebates serves to inflate list prices paid by the uninsured, among which Black and Hispanic people are overrepresented. While medication cost is a foremost barrier for many patients, other factors also propagate racial disparities in medication use. Even when cost sharing is minimal or zero, medication adherence rates have been documented to be lower among Blacks as compared with Whites. Deeper understandings are needed about how racial disparities in medication use are influenced by factors such as culture, provider bias, and patient trust in medical advice. Managed care pharmacy can address racial disparities in medication use in several ways. First, it should be acknowledged that racial disparities in medication use are pervasive and must be resolved urgently. We must not believe that entrenched health system, societal, and political structures are impermeable to change. Second, the voices of community members and their advocates must be amplified. Coverage policies, program designs, and quality initiatives should be developed in consultation with those directly affected by racial disparities. Third, the industry should commit to dramatically reducing patient cost sharing for essential medication therapies. Federal and state efforts to limit annual out-of-pocket pharmacy spending should be supported, even though increased premiums may be an undesirable (yet more equitable) consequence. Finally, information about race should be incorporated into all internal and external reporting and quality improvement activities.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesBetacoronavirusBlack or African AmericanCoronavirus InfectionsCost SharingCOVID-19Drug IndustryFees, PharmaceuticalFemaleHealth ExpendituresHealth Services AccessibilityHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleManaged Care ProgramsMedication Adherence

Identifiers

PMID33119445
PMCPMC8060916
OpenAlexW3097132139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.