Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33119096›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of infectious diseases2020

Recommendations for Intersectoral Collaboration for the Prevention and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases: Results From a Modified Delphi Process.

Carl Abelardo T Antonio, Amiel Nazer C Bermudez, Kim L Cochon, Ma Sophia Graciela L Reyes, Chelseah Denise H Torres, Sophia Anne S P Liao, Dorothy Jean N Ortega, Abegail Visia Marie C Silang, Deinzel R Uezono, Evalyn A Roxas and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Carl Abelardo T AntonioDepartment of Health Policy and Administration, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Amiel Nazer C BermudezDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Kim L CochonDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Ma Sophia Graciela L ReyesCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Chelseah Denise H TorresCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Sophia Anne S P LiaoCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Dorothy Jean N OrtegaCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Abegail Visia Marie C SilangCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Deinzel R UezonoCollege of Public Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Evalyn A RoxasDepartment of Medical Microbiology, College of Public Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Maria Sonia S SalamatDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
University of the Philippines Manila · PHPhilippine General Hospital · PHBrown University · USChinese University of Hong Kong · HKDuke-NUS Medical School · SGHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKResearch Institute for Tropical Medicine · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntersectoral collaboration in the context of the prevention and control of vector-borne diseases has been broadly described in both the literature and the current global strategy by the World Health Organization. Our aim was to develop a framework that will distill the currently known multiple models of collaboration.

methodsQualitative content analysis and logic modeling of data abstracted from 69 studies included in a scoping review done by the authors were used to develop 9 recommendation statements that summarized the composition and attributes of multisectoral approaches, which were then subjected to a modified Delphi process with 6 experts in the fields of health policy and infectious diseases.

resultsConsensus for all statements was achieved during the first round. The recommendation statements were on (1-3) sectoral engagement to supplement government efforts and augment public financing; (4) development of interventions for most systems levels; (5-6) investment in human resource, including training; (7-8) intersectoral action to implement strategies and ensure sustainability of initiatives; and (9) research to support prevention and control efforts.

conclusionsThe core of intersectoral action to prevent vector-borne diseases is collaboration among multiple stakeholders to develop, implement, and evaluate initiatives at multiple levels of intervention.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlConsensusDelphi TechniqueHealth PolicyHumansIntersectoral CollaborationPractice Guidelines as TopicVector Borne DiseasesconsensusDelphi techniqueintersectoral collaborationvector-borne diseases

Identifiers

PMID33119096
PMCPMC7594249
OpenAlexW3096694632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.