ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
KIMI: Knockoff Inference for Motif Identification from molecular sequences with controlled false discovery rate.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- DeepLINK: Deep learning inference using knockoffs with applications to genomics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe rapid development of sequencing technologies has enabled us to generate a large number of metagenomic reads from genetic materials in microbial communities, making it possible to gain deep insights into understanding the differences between the genetic materials of different groups of microorganisms, such as bacteria, viruses, plasmids, etc. Computational methods based on k-mer frequencies have been shown to be highly effective for classifying metagenomic sequencing reads into different groups. However, such methods usually use all the k-mers as features for prediction without selecting relevant k-mers for the different groups of sequences, i.e. unique nucleotide patterns containing biological significance.
resultsTo select k-mers for distinguishing different groups of sequences with guaranteed false discovery rate (FDR) control, we develop KIMI, a general framework based on model-X Knockoffs regarded as the state-of-the-art statistical method for FDR control, for sequence motif discovery with arbitrary target FDR level, such that reproducibility can be theoretically guaranteed. KIMI is shown through simulation studies to be effective in simultaneously controlling FDR and yielding high power, outperforming the broadly used Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and the q-value method for FDR control. To illustrate the usefulness of KIMI in analyzing real datasets, we take the viral motif discovery problem as an example and implement KIMI on a real dataset consisting of viral and bacterial contigs. We show that the accuracy of predicting viral and bacterial contigs can be increased by training the prediction model only on relevant k-mers selected by KIMI. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: Our implementation of KIMI is available at https://github.com/xinbaiusc/KIMI. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.