Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33119048›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2020

Effect of Vocimagene Amiretrorepvec in Combination With Flucytosine vs Standard of Care on Survival Following Tumor Resection in Patients With Recurrent High-Grade Glioma: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Timothy F Cloughesy, Kevin Petrecca, Tobias Walbert, Nicholas Butowski, Michael Salacz, James Perry, Denise Damek, Daniela Bota, Chetan Bettegowda, Jay-Jiguang Zhu and 20 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02414165 (A Phase 2/3 Randomized, Open-Label Study of Toca 511, a Retroviral Replicating Vector, Combined With Toca FC Versus Standard of Care in Subjects Undergoing Planned Resection for Recurrent Glioblastoma or Anaplastic Astrocytoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02414165 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

A Phase 2/3 Randomized, Open-Label Study of Toca 511, a Retroviral Replicating Vector, Combined With Toca FC Versus Standard of Care in Subjects Undergoing Planned Resection for Recurrent Glioblastoma or Anaplastic Astrocytoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorTocagen Inc.Ran2015 to 2019Enrolled403ConditionsGlioblastoma Multiforme, Anaplastic AstrocytomaArmsToca 511, Toca FC, Lomustine, Temozolomide, Bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of immunotherapy in high-grade glioma: learning from the past to shape future perspectives.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Next-generation therapeutics for glioblastoma: Challenges and future directions.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2026
    Review
  6. First-line treatment efficacy and prognostic model in RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: a real-world study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy F CloughesyUniversity of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Kevin PetreccaMontreal Neurological Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tobias WalbertHenry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Nicholas ButowskiUniversity of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Michael SalaczUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
James PerrySunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Denise DamekUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Daniela BotaUniversity of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Chetan BettegowdaJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jay-Jiguang ZhuUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas.
Fabio IwamotoColumbia University, New York, New York.
Dimitris PlacantonakisNew York University Langone Medical Center, New York, New York.
Lyndon KimThomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brad ElderOhio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
George KaptainJohn Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University, Hackensack, New Jersey.
David CachiaMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Yaron MoshelOverlook Medical Center, Summit, New Jersey.
Steven BremHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
David PiccioniUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
Joseph LandolfiJFK Medical Center, Edison, New Jersey.
Clark C ChenUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Harry GruberFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Aliz R RaoFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Daniel HoganFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
William AccomandoFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Derek OstertagFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Tiffany T MontellanoFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Thian KheohFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Fairooz KabbinavarFormerly Tocagen Inc, San Diego, California.
Michael A VogelbaumCleveland Clinic Foundation, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
BioNano Genomics (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USColumbia University · USFate Therapeutics (United States) · USHackensack University Medical Center · USHenry Ford Hospital · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USJohn F. Kennedy Medical Center · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USKura Oncology (United States) · USMedical University of South Carolina · USMirati Therapeutics (United States) · USMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital · CANYU Langone Health · USOverlook Medical Center · USPuma Biotechnology (United States) · USSunnybrook Research InstituteThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI David A. Nathanson · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: New treatments are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma. Objective: To compare overall survival for patients receiving tumor resection followed by vocimagene amiretrorepvec (Toca 511) with flucytosine (Toca FC) vs standard of care (SOC). Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, open-label phase 2/3 trial (TOCA 5) in 58 centers in the US, Canada, Israel, and South Korea, comparing posttumor resection treatment with Toca 511 followed by Toca FC vs a defined single choice of approved (SOC) therapies was conducted from November 30, 2015, to December 20, 2019. Patients received tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive Toca 511/FC (n = 201) or SOC control (n = 202). For the Toca 511/FC group, patients received Toca 511 injected into the resection cavity wall at the time of surgery, followed by cycles of oral Toca FC 6 weeks after surgery. For the SOC control group, patients received investigators' choice of single therapy: lomustine, temozolomide, or bevacizumab. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) in time from randomization date to death due to any cause. Secondary outcomes reported in this study included safety, durable response rate (DRR), duration of DRR, durable clinical benefit rate, OS and DRR by IDH1 variant status, and 12-month OS. Results: All 403 randomized patients (median [SD] age: 56 [11.46] years; 62.5% [252] men) were included in the efficacy analysis, and 400 patients were included in the safety analysis (3 patients on the SOC group did not receive resection). Final analysis included 271 deaths (141 deaths in the Toca 511/FC group and 130 deaths in the SOC control group). The median follow-up was 22.8 months. The median OS was 11.10 months for the Toca 511/FC group and 12.22 months for the control group (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.83, 1.35; P = .62). The secondary end points did not demonstrate statistically significant differences. The rates of adverse events were similar in the Toca 511/FC group and the SOC control group. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent tumor resection for first or second recurrence of glioblastoma or anaplastic astrocytoma, administration of Toca 511 and Toca FC, compared with SOC, did not improve overall survival or other efficacy end points. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02414165.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsCytosine DeaminaseFemaleFlucytosineGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLomustineMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant ProteinsStandard of CareAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabCytosine DeaminaseFlucytosineIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseLomustineRecombinant ProteinsTemozolomidevocimagene amiretrorepvec

Identifiers

PMID33119048
PMCPMC7596685
OpenAlexW3096229634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.