Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118959›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

App-Delivered Self-Management Intervention Trial selfBACK for People With Low Back Pain: Protocol for Implementation and Process Evaluation.

Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen, Malene Jagd Svendsen, Karen Wood, Barbara I Nicholl, Frances S Mair, Louise Fleng Sandal, Paul Jarle Mork, Karen Søgaard, Kerstin Bach, Mette Jensen Stochkendahl

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03798288 (A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - a Randomized Controlled Trial for the selfBACK Project), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03798288 nacompletednot on this map

A Decision Support System for Self-management of Low Back Pain - a Randomized Controlled Trial for the selfBACK Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern DenmarkRan2019 to 2020Enrolled461ConditionsLow Back PainArmsselfBACK, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Exercise Prescription for the Work-Life Population and Beyond.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charlotte Diana Nørregaard Rasmussen *National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1769-717X
Malene Jagd Svendsen *National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9718-9425
Karen WoodInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3671-0384
Barbara I NichollInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-0130
Frances S MairInstitute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9780-1135
Louise Fleng SandalDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-1046
Paul Jarle MorkDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-2680
Karen SøgaardDepartment of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3968-6364
Kerstin BachDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4256-7676
Mette Jensen StochkendahlInstitute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0297-8267

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImplementation and process evaluation is vital for understanding how interventions function in different settings, including if and why interventions have different effects or do not work at all.

objectiveThis paper presents the protocol for an implementation and process evaluation embedded in a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in Denmark and Norway (the selfBACK project). selfBACK is a data-driven decision support system that provides participants with weekly self-management plans for low back pain. These plans are delivered through a smartphone app and tailored to individual participants by using case-based reasoning methodology. In the trial, we compare selfBACK in addition to usual care with usual care alone.

methodsThe aim of this study is to conduct a convergent mixed-methods implementation and process evaluation of the selfBACK app by following the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance framework. We will evaluate the process of implementing selfBACK and investigate how participants use the intervention in daily life. The evaluation will also cover the reach of the intervention, health care provider willingness to adopt it, and participant satisfaction with the intervention. We will gather quantitative measures by questionnaires and measures of data analytics on app use and perform a qualitative exploration of the implementation using semistructured interviews theoretically informed by normalization process theory. Data collection will be conducted between March 2019 and October 2020.

resultsThe trial opened for recruitment in February 2019. This mixed-methods implementation and evaluation study is embedded in the randomized controlled trial and will be collecting data from March 2019 to October 2020; dissemination of trial results is planned thereafter. The results from the process evaluation are expected 2021-2022.

conclusionsThis study will provide a detailed understanding of how self-management of low back pain can be improved and how a digital health intervention can be used as an add-on to usual care to support patients to self-manage their low back pain. We will provide knowledge that can be used to explore the possibilities of extending the generic components of the selfBACK system and key drivers that could be of use in other conditions and diseases where self-management is an essential prevention or treatment strategy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03798288; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03798288. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/20308.

Indexed as

decision support systemdigital health interventionimplementationlow back painmHealthprocess evaluationrandomized controlled trialRE-AIM

Identifiers

PMID33118959
PMCPMC7661240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.