Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118955›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Web-Based Training for Nurses on Shared Decision Making and Prenatal Screening for Down Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Alex Poulin Herron, Titilayo Tatiana Agbadje, Melissa Cote, Codjo Djignefa Djade, Geneviève Roch, Francois Rousseau, France Légaré

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04162288 (RCT Protocol for Evaluating an Online Training Program on Shared Decision-making About Screening for Down Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04162288 nacompletednot on this map

RCT Protocol for Evaluating an Online Training Program on Shared Decision-making About Screening for Down Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorCHU de Quebec-Universite LavalRan2019 to 2020Enrolled36ConditionsShared Decision MakingArmsOnline Training - Shared Decision Making in Prenatal Screening, Online Training - Online Training on Prenatal Screening
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alex Poulin HerronCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6693-2271
Titilayo Tatiana AgbadjeCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4363-0585
Melissa CoteCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4345-7337
Codjo Djignefa DjadeCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5015-3246
Geneviève RochCentre de recherche en santé durable (VITAM), Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1695-1401
Francois RousseauCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Québec City, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-5507
France LégaréCanada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2296-6696
Centres Intégré Universitaires de Santé et de Services Sociaux · CAHôpital Saint-François d'Assise · CAUniversité Laval · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant women often find it difficult to choose from among the wide variety of available prenatal screening options. To help pregnant women and their partners make informed decisions based on their values, needs, and preferences, a decision aid and a web-based shared decision making (SDM) training program for health professionals have been developed. In Canada, nurses provide maternity care and thus can train as decision coaches for prenatal screening. However, there is a knowledge gap about the effectiveness of SDM interventions in maternity care in nursing practice.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the impact of an SDM training program on nurses' intentions to use a decision aid for prenatal screening and on their knowledge and to assess their overall impressions of the training.

methodsThis is a 2-arm parallel randomized trial. French-speaking nurses working with pregnant women in the province of Quebec were recruited online by a private survey firm. They were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) to either an experimental group, which completed a web-based SDM training program that included prenatal screening, or a control group, which completed a web-based training program focusing on prenatal screening alone. The experimental intervention consisted of a 3-hour web-based training hosted on the Université Laval platform with 4 modules: (1) SDM; (2) Down syndrome prenatal screening; (3) decision aids; and (4) communication between health care professionals and the patient. For the control group, the topic of SDM in Module 1 was replaced with "Context and history of prenatal screening," and the topic of decision aids in Module 3 was replaced with "Consent in prenatal screening." Participants completed a self-administered sociodemographic questionnaire with close-ended questions. We also assessed the participants' (1) intention to use a decision aid in prenatal screening clinical practice, (2) knowledge, (3) satisfaction with the training, (4) acceptability, and (5) perceived usefulness of the training. The randomization was done using a predetermined sequence and included 40 nurses. Participants and researchers were blinded. Intention to use a decision aid will be assessed by a t test. Bivariate and multivariate analysis will be performed to assess knowledge and overall impressions of the training.

resultsThis study was funded in 2017 and approved by Genome Canada. Data were collected from September 2019 to late January 2020. This paper was initially submitted before data analysis began. Results are expected to be published in winter 2020.

conclusionsStudy results will inform us on the impact of an SDM training program on nurses' intention to use and knowledge of decision aids for prenatal screening and their overall impressions of the training. Participant feedback will also inform an upgrade of the program, if needed.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04162288; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04162288. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/17878.

Indexed as

behavioral intentioncontinuing professional developmentDown syndromenursesprenatal screeningshared decision makingtraining

Identifiers

PMID33118955
PMCPMC7661244
OpenAlexW3097716554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.