Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118415›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2021

Insulin Infusion Computer Calculator Programmed Directly Into Electronic Health Record Medication Administration Record.

Kristen Kulasa, Brittany Serences, Michael Nies, Robert El-Kareh, Kirk Kurashige, Kevin Box

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Guided Insulin Infusion in Critically Ill Patients Promotes Safety, Improves Time Efficiency, and Enhances Provider Satisfaction.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
    Article
  3. Inpatient Insulin Dosing Calculators.Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Closed-Loop Medication Management with an Electronic Health Record System in U.S. and Finnish Hospitals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristen KulasaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3559-5046
Brittany SerencesDepartment of Nursing Education, Development and Research, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Michael NiesDepartment of Information Services, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2333-1382
Robert El-KarehHealth Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kirk KurashigeDepartment of Information Services-Analytics, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
Kevin BoxDepartment of Pharmacy, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputerized insulin infusion protocols have demonstrated higher staff satisfaction, better compliance with protocols, and increased time with glucose in range compared to paper protocols. At University of California San Diego Health (UCSDH), we implemented an insulin infusion computer calculator (IICC) and transitioned it from a web-based platform directly into the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) of our primary electronic health record (EHR).

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of 6306 adult patients at UCSDH receiving intravenous (IV) insulin infusion from March 7, 2013 to May 30, 2019. We created three periods of the study-(1) the pre-eMAR integration period; (2) the eMAR integration period; and (3) the post-eMAR integration period-and looked at the percentage of readings within goal range (90-150 mg/dL for intensive care unit [ICU], 90-180 mg/dL for non-ICU) in patients with and without hyperglycemic emergencies. As our safety endpoints, we elected to look at incidence of blood glucose (BG) readings <70 mg/dL, <54 mg/dL, and <40 mg/dL.

resultsPre-eMAR 69.8% of readings were in the 90-150 mg/dL range compared to 70.2% post-eMAR (

conclusionsAt UCSDH, our IICC has shown to be safe and effective in a wide variety of clinical situations and we were able to successfully transition it from a web-based platform directly into the eMAR of our primary EHR.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHyperglycemiaAdultBlood GlucoseComputersHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsRetrospective StudiesBlood GlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulincalculatorcomputer protocoldiabeteshospital diabetesinpatient diabetesinsulin infusionnurse driven

Identifiers

PMID33118415
PMCPMC8256066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.