Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118147›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2021

Specialist recommendation for chemoprevention medications in patients at familial risk of breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey in England.

Siang Ing Lee, Helen Curtis, Sadaf Qureshi, Brittany Dutton, Nadeem Qureshi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Siang Ing LeeDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2332-5452
Helen CurtisEBM DataLab, Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3429-9576
Sadaf QureshiNHS Derby and Derbyshire Clinical Commissioning Group, Derby, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2836-6712
Brittany DuttonDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5146-4911
Nadeem QureshiDivision of Primary Care, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Tower Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. Nadeem.qureshi@nottingham.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4909-0644
University of Nottingham · GBDerbyshire County Council · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In England, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline for familial breast cancer recommends chemoprevention for women at high and moderate familial risk of breast cancer. However, prescribing of chemoprevention has not improved since the introduction of the guideline in 2013. The study aims to identify the current practice, in England, of familial cancer specialists offering chemoprevention and recommending prescribing in primary care. This was an anonymized national cross-sectional survey of familial breast cancer risk services in England. Lead clinicians were sent an online survey link. The survey questions included whether chemoprevention was offered/considered for high- and moderate-risk women, when chemoprevention prescribing and recommendation to primary care started, medications prescribed, age groups considered for chemoprevention, and existence of a shared prescribing protocol with primary care. The survey was sent to 115 hospital services; responses from 50 services (43%) were included in the analysis. Of the 40 services offering chemoprevention for high-risk women, 15 (38%) did not prescribe but 31 (78%) recommended prescribing to primary care. Of the 31 services considering chemoprevention for moderate risk, eight (26%) did not prescribe with 26 (84%) recommended prescribing to primary care. Only three services reported having a shared protocol with primary care. Within 3 years of the guidelines, many services recognized the role of chemoprevention for both high and moderate risk with a key role for primary care to initiate prescribing. However, there is still room for improvement.

Indexed as

Breast neoplasmFamilial breast cancerGenetic predisposition to diseaseGuidelines

Identifiers

PMID33118147
PMCPMC7846641
OpenAlexW3097550595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.