Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118134›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

Outcomes of a Swallowable Intragastric Balloon (Elipse™) on 96 Overweight and Obese Patients.

Osama Taha, Mahmoud Abdelaal, Awny Asklany, Mohamed Alaa, Sherif Belal, Islam El Assal, Maha Shahin, Ahmed Abubasha, Dalia Elbanhawy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Endoscopic bariatrics: Current status and emerging technologies.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Six intragastric balloons: Which to choose?World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Osama TahaBariatric Unit, Plastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.
Mahmoud AbdelaalBariatric Unit, Plastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt. mahmoud.abdel-aal@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-4812
Awny AsklanyBariatric Unit, Plastic and Obesity Surgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.
Mohamed AlaaOsama Taha Group Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Sherif BelalOsama Taha Group Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Islam El AssalOsama Taha Group Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Maha ShahinOsama Taha Group Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed AbubashaOsama Taha Group Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Dalia ElbanhawyOsama Taha Group Clinics, Cairo, Egypt.
Assiut University · EGCairo University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe traditional gastric balloons have been used for several years to reduce weight in overweight and obese patients, but the need for sedation and upper endoscopy leading to several limitations. The current series is the first study that evaluates the safety and effectiveness of the swallowable gastric (Elipse™) balloon in our population on the national level.

methodsNinety-six patients (mean BMI was 33.6 ± 4.3 kg/m

resultsIn the current series, at end of the procedure (after 4 months), the overall mean weight loss (WL) was 11.2 ± 5.1 kg, mean waist circumference reduction was 10.9 ± 2.1 cm, and a mean BMI reduction was 4.9 ± 2.0 kg/m

conclusionThis swallowable gastric balloon (Elipse

Indexed as

Gastric BalloonObesity, MorbidBody Mass IndexHumansObesityOverweightTreatment OutcomeBalloonElipseOverweight

Identifiers

PMID33118134
OpenAlexW3096272444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.