Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118133›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2021

One Anastomosis/Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) as Revisional Surgery Following Primary Restrictive Bariatric Procedures: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mohammad Kermansaravi, Shahab Shahabi Shahmiri, Amir Hossein DavarpanahJazi, Rohollah Valizadeh, Giovanna Berardi, Antonio Vitiello, Mario Musella, Miguel Carbajo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammad KermansaraviDepartment of Surgery, Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Rasool-e Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Shahab Shahabi ShahmiriMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Amir Hossein DavarpanahJaziMinimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Rohollah ValizadehDepartment of Epidemiology, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical science, Tehran, Iran.
Giovanna BerardiAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
Antonio VitielloAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy.
Mario MusellaAdvanced Biomedical Sciences Department, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy. mario.musella@unina.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7669-5115
Miguel CarbajoCentre of Excellence for the Study and Treatment of Obesity and Diabetes, Valladolid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) has gained popularity in the past decade. International databases were searched for articles published by September 10, 2020, on OAGB/MGB as a revisional procedure after restrictive procedures. Twenty-six studies examining a total of 1771 patients were included. The mean initial BMI was 45.70 kg/m

Indexed as

Gastric BypassGastroesophageal RefluxObesity, MorbidHumansRetrospective StudiesWeight LossConversionGastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB)Weight lossWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID33118133
PMCPMC7809003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.