ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2021
Identification of the control factors affecting water quality variation at multi-spatial scales in a headwater watershed.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of hydro-chemical facies and surface water quality dynamics using multivariate statistical approaches in Southern Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Riverine bacterial communities are more shaped by species sorting in intensive urban and agricultural watersheds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effects of forest cover pattern on water quality of low-order streams in an agricultural landscape in the Pirapora river basin, Brazil.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the effect of landscape characteristics on water quality can provide insight into mitigating water quality impairment. However, there is no consensus about the key controlling factors influencing water quality. This paper examined the combined effects of land use and topography on water quality across multi-scale, and identified the key controlling factors determining water quality variation in the headwater watershed of the Hengxi reservoir in Eastern China. Water quality impairment (WQI), expressed as a composite variable, was established to measure the overall water quality. We used the partial least squares (PLSR) method to explore the combination of landscape metrics and identify the key controlling factors. Results showed that the optimal PLSR model at 50-m, 100-m, and 150-m buffer scales and catchment scale explained 77%, 63%, 60%, and 56% of variability in WQI, respectively. At catchment scale, patch density, the percentage of paddy field, and hypsometric integral were the key controlling factors impacting water quality. At buffer scales, the slope gradient, the percentage of forest land, and topographic wetness index were more effectively determined WQI variation. Thus, the key controlling factors depend on spatial scales. Both spatial scales and corresponding key controlling factors should be considered in the adjustment of land use composition and planning of landscape configuration to better protect water quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33118069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.