Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33118050›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2021

Frequency, diagnosis, pathogenesis and management of osteoporosis in alkaptonuria: data analysis from the UK National Alkaptonuria Centre.

L R Ranganath, M Khedr, S Vinjamuri, J A Gallagher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Combined alkaptonuria and osteoporosis contributing to chronic back pain.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Alkaptonuria.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L R RanganathDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK. lrang@liv.ac.uk.
M KhedrDepartments of Clinical Biochemistry and Metabolic Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
S VinjamuriNuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescot Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK.
J A GallagherIACD, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, West Derby Street, Liverpool, L7 8TX, UK.
University of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis and fractures are common features of alkaptonuria.

introductionA large cohort of alkaptonuria (AKU) patients was studied to better recognise and characterise osteoporosis and fractures in AKU.

methodsAssessments including questionnaire analysis, DEXA and CT densitometry at the neck of femur (FN), total hip (TH) and lumbar spine (LS) were performed on patients at baseline when 2 mg nitisinone was commenced, and yearly thereafter. Blood and urine samples were collected for chemical measurement. CT BMD Z-scores were generated.

resultsBetween June 2007 and March 2020, 87 AKU patients attended the NAC. At baseline, there were 48 fractures in 39 patients. Prevalence of osteoporosis was 3.1 at FN, 10.8 at TH and 24.7% at LS respectively. Prevalence of fragility fractures was greatly increased at 44.8%. The group with fractures showed increased ochronosis scores (p < 0.05). CT LS showed an inverse relationship with fractures (R = - 0.28; p < 0.05). CT LS was significantly lower in the fracture group (p < 0.002). Following nitisinone only, CT FN and CT TH decreased significantly (p < 0.05 and 0.01 respectively). Following nitisinone plus antiresorptive therapy, CT FN, CT TH and CT LS all increased significantly (p < 0.05, 0.05 and 0.001 respectively). However, patients on nitisinone plus antiresorptive had more fractures than nitisinone and no-treatment groups (p < 0.05).

conclusionsOsteopenia and fragility fractures are common in AKU.. Anti-resorptive therapy increased BMD in AKU without decreasing fragility fractures. Bone densitometry measurements by DXA are less reliable than quantitative CT at the LS in AKU.

Indexed as

AlkaptonuriaFractures, BoneOsteoporosisBone DensityData AnalysisHumansUnited KingdomAlkaptonuriaAntiresorptive therapyCTBMDFracturesNitisinoneOsteoporosisZ-scores

Identifiers

PMID33118050
OpenAlexW3094775719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.