Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33117692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

The Prognostic Relevance of the Proliferation Markers Ki-67 and Plk1 in Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer Patients With Serous, Low-Grade Carcinoma Based on mRNA and Protein Expression.

Franz Rödel, Shengtao Zhou, Balász Győrffy, Monika Raab, Mourad Sanhaji, Ranadip Mandal, Daniel Martin, Sven Becker, Klaus Strebhardt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Franz RödelDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Shengtao ZhouState Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Balász GyőrffyDepartment of Bioinformatics and 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Monika RaabDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Mourad SanhajiDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Ranadip MandalDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Daniel MartinDepartment of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sven BeckerDepartment of Gynecology, University Hospital, Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Klaus StrebhardtGerman Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEFrankfurt Cancer Institute · DEHeidelberg University · DESemmelweis University · HUWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since type and duration of an appropriate adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage ovarian cancer (OC) are still being debated, novel markers for a better stratification of these patients are of utmost importance for the design of an improved chemotherapeutical strategy. In contrast to numerous cancer studies on cellular proliferation based on the immunohistochemistry-driven evaluation of protein expression, we compared mRNA and protein expression of two independent markers of cellular proliferation, Ki-67 and Plk1, in a large cohort of 243 early-stage OC and their relationship with clinicopathological features and survival. Based on marker expression we demonstrate that early-stage OC patients (stages I/II, low-grade, serous) with high expression (Ki-67, Plk1) had a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to patients with low expression (Ki-67, Plk1). Remarkably, based on mRNA expression this significant difference got lost in advanced stages (III/IV): At least for PFS, high levels of Ki-67 and Plk1 correlate with moderately better survival compared to patients with low expressing tumors. Our data suggest that in addition to Ki-67, Plk1 is a novel marker for the stratification of early-stage OC patients to maximize therapeutic efforts. Both, Ki-67 and Plk1, seem to be better suited in early-stages (I/II) as therapeutical targets compared to advanced-stages (III/IV) OC.

Indexed as

Ki-67/MIB1mRNA and protein expressionovarian cancerpolo-like kinase 1prognosis

Identifiers

PMID33117692
PMCPMC7577119
OpenAlexW3092146302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.