Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33117678›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2020

Modern MR Imaging Technology in Rectal Cancer; There Is More Than Meets the Eye.

Hester E Haak, Monique Maas, Stefano Trebeschi, Regina G H Beets-Tan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy: how certain is radiology?]Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hester E HaakDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Monique MaasDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stefano TrebeschiDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Regina G H Beets-TanDepartment of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MR imaging (MRI) is now part of the standard work up of patients with rectal cancer. Restaging MRI has been traditionally used to plan the surgical approach. Its role has recently increased and been adopted as a valuable tool to assist the clinical selection of clinical (near) complete responders for organ preserving treatment. Recently several studies have addressed new imaging biomarkers that combined with morphological provides a comprehensive picture of the tumor. Diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) has entered the clinics and proven useful for response assessment after chemoradiotherapy. Other functional (quantitative) MRI technologies are on the horizon including artificial intelligence modeling. This narrative review provides an overview of recent advances in rectal cancer (re)staging by imaging with a specific focus on response prediction and evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment response. Furthermore, directions are given for future research.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencefunctional imagingMR imagingorgan preservationrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID33117678
PMCPMC7578261
OpenAlexW3092591389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.