Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33117550›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2020

COVID-19 Status, Symptom Burden, and Characteristics of Dialysis Patients Residing in Areas of Community Transmission: Research Letter.

Jonathan Gale, David Austin Clark, Clara Bohm, Mark Canney, Ian Davis, Jason Joseph LeBlanc, Angela Maxine Shorter, Rita S Suri, Amanda Jean Vinson, Kenneth A West and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan GaleDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
David Austin ClarkDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Clara BohmDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Mark CanneyDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-3083
Ian DavisDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Jason Joseph LeBlancDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Angela Maxine ShorterNova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Rita S SuriDepartment of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0519-3927
Amanda Jean VinsonDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Kenneth A WestDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Karthik Kannan TennankoreDepartment of Medicine, Dalhousie University & Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7919-6709
Dalhousie University · CAMcGill University · CANova Scotia Health Authority · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRoutine testing of hemodialysis patients for COVID-19 (outside of those identified as "at risk" based on regional practice) is not universally recommended. However, there is variability in the clinical presentation of COVID-19; patients may experience symptoms that do not meet regional criteria for testing and some patients with active infection may be asymptomatic. To avoid missing individuals who are infected, consideration could be made for regular screening, particularly among those residing in areas with evidence of community spread.

objectiveTo describe the clinical characteristics, symptom burden, and COVID-19 status in a cross-section of hemodialysis patients residing in areas with evidence of community spread.

designCross-sectional study.

settingThree hemodialysis units in a large tertiary care facility in Nova Scotia, Canada. PATIENTS: In-center hemodialysis patients who resided in areas with evidence of community transmission at the time of the study.

methodsAll dialysis patients (irrespective of whether or not they resided in areas with community spread) completed a standard "at-risk" questionnaire for COVID-19 based on (1) 2 or more of new or worsening cough, fever greater than 38°C, sore throat, headache, runny nose/new or acute respiratory illness consistent with infection or (2) any one of close contact with a known/suspected case, travel outside of the province or residence in a facility with an outbreak prior to entry into the dialysis unit at each treatment. Patients residing in areas with evidence of community spread were swabbed for SARS-CoV-2 over a 1-week period (May 1-7, 2020) using a combined oropharyngeal/nares swab irrespective of whether or not they were identified as "at-risk." MEASUREMENTS: Baseline characteristics of patients were acquired using electronic records. In addition to the "at-risk" questionnaire, patients answered "yes" or "no" to any of the following symptoms at the time of the swab (sneeze, fatigue, myalgia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, malaise, abdominal pain, loss of taste, and loss of smell).

resultsOf the 334 patients receiving dialysis at the time of the study, 133 resided in areas with evidence of community transmission and 104 consented for the study. No patients met our regional criteria for being "at-risk" and no patients reported cough, sore throat or fever at the time of swab. Many other symptoms were noted, including sneezing (24%), fatigue (16%), myalgias (11%), nausea/vomiting (11%), loss of taste (4%), and loss of smell (4%). Overall, 100% of swabs performed for this study were negative for SARS-CoV-2. LIMITATIONS: Single-center study, and the daily new case rate was exceedingly low (4-14) at the time of the study, emphasizing that the findings are not generalizable to areas of higher prevalence of SARS-CoV-2.

conclusionsIn this study of hemodialysis patients residing in areas with community spread who otherwise did not meet symptom criteria for being "at-risk," we did not identify any individual who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Future studies are needed to examine the utility of routine testing for COVID-19 (outside of those who are "at-risk") in areas of higher disease prevalence.

trial registrationNot applicable as this is not a clinical trial.

Indexed as

COVID-19hemodialysisinfectious diseasesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33117550
PMCPMC7573725
OpenAlexW3092966647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.