Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33117195›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

The Acute Physiological Responses to Traditional vs. Practical Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Exercise in Untrained Men and Women.

Eduardo D S Freitas, Bianca R A Galletti, Karolina J Koziol, Ryan M Miller, Aaron D Heishman, Christopher D Black, Debra Bemben, Michael G Bemben

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Superimposed Blood Flow Restriction on Isokinetic Knee Extension.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perceived Barriers to Blood Flow Restriction Training.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eduardo D S FreitasNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Bianca R A GallettiNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Karolina J KoziolNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Ryan M MillerNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Aaron D HeishmanNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Christopher D BlackSensory and Muscle Function Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Debra BembenBone Density Research Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Michael G BembenNeuromuscular Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the acute physiological responses of traditional and practical blood flow restriction resistance exercise (tBFR and pBFR, respectively) and high- and low-load resistance exercise without BFR (HL and LL, respectively), as well as the potential sex differences within the aforementioned exercise methods. Fourteen men and fifteen women randomly completed the following experimental conditions: (1) tBFR, consisting of four sets of 30-15-15-15 repetitions of the bilateral horizontal leg press and knee extension exercises, at 30% of one-repetition maximum (1-RM), with a 13.5 cm wide pneumatic cuff placed at the most proximal portion of each thigh and inflated to a pressure equivalent to 50% of the participant's total occlusion pressure; (2) pBFR, which was the same as the tBFR condition, except that an elastic band wrapped around the proximal portion of each thigh at a tightness of 7 on a 0 to 10 perceived pressure scale was used to reduce blood flow; (3) LL, same as the tBFR and pBFR protocols, except that no BFR was applied; and (4) HL, consisting of 3 sets of 10 repetitions at 80% of 1-RM, with the same 1-min rest interval between sets and a 3-min rest period between exercises. At baseline, immediately post-, 5 min post-, and 15 min post-exercise, whole-blood lactate (WBL), indices of muscle swelling (muscle thickness and thigh circumference), hematocrit and plasma volume changes, were measured as well as superficial electromyography (sEMG) amplitude during exercise. There were no significant (

Indexed as

electromyographyhematocritKAATSUlactatemuscle swellingocclusion trainingplasma volume changesstrength exercise

Identifiers

PMID33117195
PMCPMC7552431
OpenAlexW3089769803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.