ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020
Deep Learning Algorithm Classifies Heartbeat Events Based on Electrocardiogram Signals.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Cardiovascular-Related Diseases from Wearable Devices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Pooled it
- Understanding the shortcomings of heart rate variability as a tool for autonomic analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Unveiling Hearts: Deep Learning-Based Electrocardiogram Classification for Congenital Heart Disease Detection.Current medical science · 2025Article
- Article
- Pragmatic screening for heart failure in the general population using an electrocardiogram-based neural network.ESC heart failure · 2023Observational
- Algorithms for automated diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases based on ECG data: A comprehensive systematic review.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Convolutional Neural Network-Based ECG-Assisted Diagnosis for Coal Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Review
- A Powerful Paradigm for Cardiovascular Risk Stratification Using Multiclass, Multi-Label, and Ensemble-Based Machine Learning Paradigms: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Advanced Bioelectrical Signal Processing Methods: Past, Present and Future Approach-Part I: Cardiac Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Trends in Heart-Rate Variability Signal Analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Review
- Article
- RR Interval-based Atrial Fibrillation Detection using Traditional and Ensemble Machine Learning Algorithms.Journal of medical signals and sensorsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have become the number 1 threat to human health. Their numerous complications mean that many countries remain unable to prevent the rapid growth of such diseases, although significant health resources have been invested toward their prevention and management. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most important non-invasive physiological signal for CVD screening and diagnosis. For exploring the heartbeat event classification model using single- or multiple-lead ECG signals, we proposed a novel deep learning algorithm and conducted a systemic comparison based on the different methods and databases. This new approach aims to improve accuracy and reduce training time by combining the convolutional neural network (CNN) with the bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM). To our knowledge, this approach has not been investigated to date. In this study, Database I with single-lead ECG and Database II with 12-lead ECG were used to explore a practical and viable heartbeat event classification model. An evolutionary neural system approach (Method I) and a deep learning approach (Method II) that combines CNN with BiLSTM network were compared and evaluated in processing heartbeat event classification. Overall, Method I achieved slightly better performance than Method II. However, Method I took, on average, 28.3 h to train the model, whereas Method II needed only 1 h. Method II achieved an accuracy of 80, 82.6, and 85% compared with the China Physiological Signal Challenge 2018, PhysioNet Challenge 2017, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) Arrhythmia datasets, respectively. These results are impressive compared with the performance of state-of-the-art algorithms used for the same purpose.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.