Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33117191›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2020

Deep Learning Algorithm Classifies Heartbeat Events Based on Electrocardiogram Signals.

Yongbo Liang, Shimin Yin, Qunfeng Tang, Zhenyu Zheng, Mohamed Elgendi, Zhencheng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Convolutional Neural Network-Based ECG-Assisted Diagnosis for Coal Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Trends in Heart-Rate Variability Signal Analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yongbo LiangSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Shimin YinSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Qunfeng TangSchool of Electronic Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Zhenyu ZhengSchool of Electronic Engineering and Automation, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.
Mohamed ElgendiSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Zhencheng ChenSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) have become the number 1 threat to human health. Their numerous complications mean that many countries remain unable to prevent the rapid growth of such diseases, although significant health resources have been invested toward their prevention and management. Electrocardiogram (ECG) is the most important non-invasive physiological signal for CVD screening and diagnosis. For exploring the heartbeat event classification model using single- or multiple-lead ECG signals, we proposed a novel deep learning algorithm and conducted a systemic comparison based on the different methods and databases. This new approach aims to improve accuracy and reduce training time by combining the convolutional neural network (CNN) with the bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM). To our knowledge, this approach has not been investigated to date. In this study, Database I with single-lead ECG and Database II with 12-lead ECG were used to explore a practical and viable heartbeat event classification model. An evolutionary neural system approach (Method I) and a deep learning approach (Method II) that combines CNN with BiLSTM network were compared and evaluated in processing heartbeat event classification. Overall, Method I achieved slightly better performance than Method II. However, Method I took, on average, 28.3 h to train the model, whereas Method II needed only 1 h. Method II achieved an accuracy of 80, 82.6, and 85% compared with the China Physiological Signal Challenge 2018, PhysioNet Challenge 2017, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) Arrhythmia datasets, respectively. These results are impressive compared with the performance of state-of-the-art algorithms used for the same purpose.

Indexed as

arrhythmia detectionBiLSTM neural networkCNN – convolutional neural networkdata sciencedigital healthdigital medicine

Identifiers

PMID33117191
PMCPMC7566908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.