Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33117039›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2020

Feasibility of Kahoot! as a Real-Time Assessment Tool in (Histo-)pathology Classroom Teaching.

Daniel Neureiter, Eckhard Klieser, Bettina Neumayer, Paul Winkelmann, Romana Urbas, Tobias Kiesslich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Medical Child Abuse Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Radiation Oncology Active Learning in Undergraduate Medical Education: The Usefulness of Kahoot and TikTok.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Child Sexual Abuse Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Abusive Pediatric Burns Module in the Child Abuse Pediatrics Curriculum for Physicians (CAP-CuP).MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Study Based on Gamification of Tests throughHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluating e-Learning in the Pathology Course During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniel NeureiterInstitute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Eckhard KlieserInstitute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Bettina NeumayerInstitute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Paul WinkelmannInstitute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Romana UrbasInstitute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
Tobias KiesslichDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNew technologies like gamification are continuously integrated into medical education during the last years. However, the benefit and implementation of such gaming platforms are not clearly studied. This analysis assesses the feasibility of Kahoot! regarding simplicity and low-cost performance as a learning/teaching tool for medical education in (histo-)pathology. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this feasibility pilot study, we developed 36 modules for different benign and malignant tumors, covering four major topics: gastrointestinal tract, dermatology, urogenital tract, and hematology. Each module included histomorphological text-based questions for education of 2nd-year medical students. The online gaming-platform Kahoot! was anonymously implemented before and after "classical" medical education which included discussions of histological slides for each tumor entity using Microsoft PowerPoint-based presentations in combination with microscopical demonstrations. Participating students were invited to a seven-questions evaluation about the online educational approach.

resultsOverall, 23 of 51 students of the study class completed the pre- and the post-evaluation of Kahoot! in one or more organ systems. The percentage of correct answers increased from the initial mean/median of 47.2/45% to 77.2/76.3%. Simultaneously, the time for answering questions decreased by roughly 50% (from mean/median time of 9.1/8.3 seconds to 5.1/4.3 seconds) from pre- to post-assessment. The results were independent of gender; however, there were scoring differences between the different organ systems. Students positively evaluated the routine implementation of the gaming-platform Kahoot! within medical education.

conclusionKahoot! is as a simple, direct, and low-cost application in medical teaching improving learning outcomes of pathomorphological topics with high acceptance by students. Kahoot!-based evaluations should be also performed in more advanced topics in the field of histopathology.

Indexed as

education assessmentKahoot!medical educationonline-toolspathology

Identifiers

PMID33117039
PMCPMC7547141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.