Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116931›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2020

A Culturally Sensitive and Supportive Maternity Care Service Increases the Uptake of Maternity Waiting Homes in Ethiopia.

Desta Workneh Selbana, Msganaw Derese, Enatfenta Sewmehone Endalew, Bosena Tebeje Gashaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perspectives of pregnant women on the utilisation of a maternity waiting home near Onandjokwe Lutheran Hospital in Oshikoto Region, Namibia.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Desta Workneh SelbanaCollege of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Msganaw DereseCollege of Health Sciences, Mizan-Tepi University, Mizan-Tepi, Ethiopia.
Enatfenta Sewmehone EndalewCollege of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Bosena Tebeje GashawCollege of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0001-6337-8404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal delays in utilization of emergency obstetric care are impacting on a high maternal mortality, especially in the poor resource countries including Ethiopia. Different strategies are designed and employed to reduce those maternal delays, and one of such strategies employed to overcome the geographic barriers and improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes is utilization of maternity waiting homes (MWHs). Studies related to the utilization of MWHs and associated factors are limited in Ethiopia and there were none in the study area.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the utilization of maternity waiting homes and associated factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A community-based cross-sectional study design was conducted, using multistage sampling technique. Logistic regression analysis with 95% CI for odds ratio (OR) was used to identify significant factors.

resultsA total of 379 women participated in this study, making a response rate of 85%. Of the total participants, 42.5% (95% CI=38-48) of women utilized MWHs. After controlling for potential confounders, women's decision-making capacity (AOR=12.74; 95% CI=6.18-26.26), women having someone who can care for their children and/or husband at home (AOR=2.71; 95% CI=1.44-5.09), MWHs offering food service (AOR=4.03; 95% CI=2.07- 7.85), offering and/or allowing women to practice their own cultural ceremony (allowing to cook their own food type, porridge, coffee, etc) (AOR=9.55; 95% CI=4.45-20.47), and women's attitude towards MWHs (AOR=0.09; 95% CI=0.03-0.23) were factors significantly associated with the utilization of MWHs.

conclusionCompared to its contribution in reducing maternal and perinatal mortality, the utilization of MWHs was low in this study area. The integration of culturally sensitive and supportive maternity services, along with community participatory approach, would increase utilization of MWHs and consequently contribute in achieving the SDGs related to maternal and neonatal health.

Indexed as

cultural sensitivityEthiopiamaternity waiting homessupportive maternity servicesutilization

Identifiers

PMID33116931
PMCPMC7553138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.