Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116910›Full record

ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry2020

Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries - Two Case Reports.

Ollie Yiru Yu, Ahmed Mohamed Zaeneldin, Hamdi Hosni Hamda Hamama, May Lei Mei, Neil Patel, Chun-Hung Chu

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Tunnel Restoration: A Minimally Invasive Dentistry Practice.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Ollie Yiru YuFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5310-5039
Ahmed Mohamed ZaeneldinFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0874-9302
Hamdi Hosni Hamda HamamaFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0003-3205-345X
May Lei MeiFaculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7745-257X
Neil PatelDivision of Dentistry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Chun-Hung ChuFaculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-8167-0430
University of Hong Kong · HKMansoura University · EGUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradigms of contemporary caries management have shifted to minimal intervention dentistry. Conservative restorative procedures are recommended to replace the complete removal of all carious tissues in the management of dental caries. This article reports two clinical cases of conservative restorations of proximal caries. Different conservative cavity designs and restorative techniques were performed in the two cases. Proximal caries in posterior teeth were prepared using the box-only preparation technique or the proximal tunnel preparation technique. The cavities were restored directly with resin composites. The advantages of using the box-only preparation with fissure sealant included the maximum conservation of tooth hard tissues and the prevention of unnecessary tissue removal in the occlusal surface. The tunnel preparation preserved the marginal ridge and protected the restored tooth from fracture. The filling of composites into the tunnel demonstrated a better marginal adaptation than other restorative materials. These two techniques allowed for the preservation of more healthy dental hard tissue compared with traditional techniques. Potential problems in the restoration included the high incidence of the inappropriate removal of dental hard tissue, damage of the vital pulp and the microleakage due to the polymerization shrinkage. The solutions to minimize the risk of these problems in the operative procedures were discussed.

Indexed as

cariescase reportminimally invasive dentistryresin compositerestoration

Identifiers

PMID33116910
PMCPMC7549752
OpenAlexW3092184057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.