ArticleCancer management and research2020
Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma by Targeting the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Combined with Gemcitabine Plus Platinum.
Article in Cancer management and research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision drugs for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the anti-tumor activity and safety of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody combined with gemcitabine plus platinum (GP) as a first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RM-NPC). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed RM-NPC patients at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who received anti-EGFR antibody plus GP as a first-line treatment between July 2007 and November 2018. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method with Log rank test. Cox proportional hazards model was used for the multivariate analysis.
resultsA total of 84 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.3 months (95% CI, 6.9-13.6 months), and the median overall survival (OS) was 42.8 months (95% CI, 24.6-60.9 months). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 67.9% and 92.9%, respectively. The multivariate analysis identified a higher baseline EBV DNA level as a risk factor for both PFS (P=0.025) and OS (P=0.013). Additionally, age≥44 years (P =0.003), non-cisplatin (P= 0.009), and poor KPS (≤80) (P =0.034) were other risk factors for OS. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (n=73, 86.9%). The most common grade 3-4 AEs were leukopenia (n=30, 35.7%) and thrombocytopenia (n=22, 26.2%).
conclusionAnti-EGFR monoclonal antibody plus GP achieved promising antitumor activity with a tolerable toxicity profile in RM-NPC as a first-line treatment. Randomized clinical trials are warranted to compare the efficacy of GP with or without anti-EGFR antibody in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.