Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116761›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenomics and personalized medicine2020

Pharmacogenomics and Pharmacogenetics: In Silico Prediction of Drug Effects in Treatments for Novel Coronavirus SARS-CoV2 Disease.

Concetta Cafiero, Agnese Re, Alessandra Micera, Raffaele Palmirotta, Delio Monaco, Francesca Romano, Claudia Fabrizio, Raffaele Di Francia, Andrea Cacciamani, Pier Luigi Surico and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Phacoemulsification and nucleic acid-enriched aerosol: considerations from an eye model of cataract simulation.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Concetta Cafiero *Medical Oncology, SG Moscati Hospital, Taranto, Italy.
Agnese Re *CNR-IASI, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-6568
Alessandra Micera *Research Laboratories in Ophthalmology, IRCCS - Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-6071
Raffaele PalmirottaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Clinical Oncology, Oncogenomic Research Center, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-7377
Delio MonacoRadiology, SG Moscati Hospital, Taranto, Italy.
Francesca RomanoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Luigi Vanvitelli University of Campania, Napoli, Italy.
Claudia FabrizioInfectious Disease Unit, SG Moscati Hospital, Taranto, Italy.
Raffaele Di FranciaItalian Association of Pharmacogenomics and Molecular Diagnostics, Ancona, Italy.
Andrea CacciamaniResearch Laboratories in Ophthalmology, IRCCS - Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy.
Pier Luigi SuricoOncology and Hematology Department, F Miulli Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy.
Gerardo D'AmatoEndocrine and Metabolic Surgery, A Gemelli Polyclinic Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Salvatore PiscontiMedical Oncology, SG Moscati Hospital, Taranto, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera S.Giuseppe Moscati · ITFondazione G.B. Bietti · ITAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITItalian Association for Cancer Research · ITOspedale Generale Regionale Francesco Miulli · ITUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The latest developments in precision medicine allow the modulation of therapeutic approaches in different pathologies on the basis of the specific molecular characterization of the patient. This review of the literature coupled with in silico analysis was to provide a selected screening of interactions between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and drugs (repurposed, investigational, and biological agents) showing efficacy and toxicityin counteracting Covid-19 infection. In silico analysis of genetic variants related to each drug was performed on such databases as PharmGKB, Ensembl Genome Browser, www.drugs.com, and SNPedia, with an extensive literature review of papers (to May 10, 2020) on Covid-19 treatments using Medline, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, PharmGKB, and Google Scholar. The clinical relevance of SNPs, known as both drug targets and markers, considering genetic variations with known drug responses, and the therapeutic consequences are discussed. In the context of clinical treatment of Covid-19, including infection prevention, control measures, and supportive care, this review highlights the importance of a personalized approach in the final selection of therapy, which is probably essential in the management of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

ADRCovid-19drug effectsin silicopharmacogeneticspharmacogenomicsSARS-CoV2

Identifiers

PMID33116761
PMCPMC7568633
OpenAlexW3091862030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.