Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116651›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2020

Qualitative Study of Practices and Challenges of Stepping Down Asthma Medication in Primary Care Across the UK.

Chloe I Bloom, Helen Ramsey, Marsha Alter, Shivali Lakhani, Ernie Wong, Katharine Hickman, Sarah L Elkin, Azeem Majeed, Austen El-Osta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chloe I BloomAirways Disease Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1285-7602
Helen RamseyKent and Medway CCG, Swanscombe and Bean Partnership, Swanscombe Kent, UK.
Marsha AlterMiddlesex Pharmaceutical Group of LPCs & Community Pharmacy Research Champion NIHR NWL CRN, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5662-7943
Shivali LakhaniMiddlesex Pharmaceutical Group of LPCs & Community Pharmacy Research Champion NIHR NWL CRN, London, UK.
Ernie WongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Katharine HickmanWest Yorkshire & Harrogate Health and Care Partnership, Low Moor Medical Practice, West Yorkshire, UK.
Sarah L ElkinDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK.
Azeem Majeed *Department of Primary Care & Public Health School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Austen El-Osta *Department of Primary Care & Public Health School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8772-4938

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend that asthma treatment should be stepped down to the minimally effective dose that achieves symptom control to prevent medication side effects and reduce unnecessary costs. Little is known about the practice of stepping down and the challenges in primary care, where most asthma patients are managed.

objectiveTo explore views, experiences, barriers and ideas, of doctors, nurses and pharmacists working in primary care, related to step down of asthma medication.

methodsPrimary care practitioners from across the UK participated in a survey and/or semi-structured interview. Questions explored four main areas: how asthma medication is reviewed, views on asthma guidelines, perceived barriers faced by healthcare workers and facilitators of stepping down. Qualitative content analysis enabled data coding of interview transcripts to identify major themes.

resultsA total of 274 participants responded to the survey, 29 participated in an interview (12 doctors, 9 nurses, and 8 pharmacists), working in GP practices from across the UK. Nearly half of the survey participants infrequently step down asthma medication (doctors=42.7%, nurses=46.3%). Four major themes related to barriers to stepping down were (i) lack of awareness of the need to step down, (ii) inertia to step down, driven by low confidence in ability, fear of consequences, and concern for who is responsible for stepping down, (iii) self-efficacy of ability to step down, influenced by lack of clear, applied guidance and limited training, and (iv) feasibility of step down, driven by a lack of systematic acceptance of stepping down and time. Strategies proposed to reduce overtreatment included education and training, improved gathering of evidence and guidance, and integrating step down into routine asthma care.

conclusionFailure to implement this guideline recommendation into everyday asthma management is influenced by several contributing factors. Future directions should include addressing evidence gaps, implementing clear and practical guidance, integration of step-down assessment into the asthma review, and education of professionals and patients.

Indexed as

asthmaperceptionsprimary carequalitativestepping down

Identifiers

PMID33116651
PMCPMC7547777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.