ArticleOncoTargets and therapy2020
Article in OncoTargets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of CT-guided 125I particle implantation for the treatment of elderly lung cancer: a system evaluation and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Combined Use of RadioactiveCancer management and research · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with iodine-125 seed implantation in driver gene-negative non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Comparative safety and efficacy of single-agent chemotherapy combined with microwave ablation versus radioactive seed brachytherapy in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC: a ten-year retrospective study.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
- Recent progress in radioactive seed implantation brachytherapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of CT-guided MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 110 patients (64 men and 46 women; mean age=71.25±7.14 years) who were diagnosed with NSCLC without distant metastases between January 2015 and May 2020. A total of 50 patients received
resultsAll patients had been treated and were followed-up for 3-60 months. The median OS and PFS were 23.71±1.41 months (95% CI=20.95-26.47) vs 16.12±0.93 months (95% CI=14.31-17.93) (
conclusionCT-guided
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.