Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116545›Full record

ReviewTherapeutics and clinical risk management2020

The Technique of Intradiscal Injection: A Narrative Review.

Alberto Migliore, Andrea Sorbino, Serenella Bacciu, Alberto Bellelli, Bruno Frediani, Sandro Tormenta, Carmelo Pirri, Calogero Foti

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Establishing a through-puncture model for assessing post-injection leakage in the intervertebral disc.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alberto MiglioreRheumatology, S. Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3397-6478
Andrea SorbinoPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Serenella BacciuPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.
Alberto BellelliRadiology, Fatebenefratelli S. Pietro Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4613-519X
Bruno FredianiResearch Centre of Systemic Autoinflammatory Diseases Behcet Disease Clinic and Rheumatology-Ophthalmology Collaborative Uveitis Centre Department of Medical Sciences Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Sandro TormentaRadiology, Fatebenefratelli S. Pietro Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Carmelo PirriPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-6549
Calogero FotiPhysical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2246-348X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow back pain (LBP) is one of the most common spine diseases and represents the most frequent cause of absence from work in developed countries. Approximately 40% of chronic LBP is related to discogenic origin. The goal of the study is producing a review of literature to describe analytically the techniques of intradiscal injections.

methodsPubMed database was searched for clinical studies with the different key terms: "intradiscal", "injection", "steroid" "procedures", "techniques", "CT", "MRI", "fluoroscopy", "fluoroscopic", "guidance", "ozone", "ultrasound", "images". Only studies written in English, French, or Italian in which the intradiscal injection represents the main procedure for the low back discopathy treatment on humans were considered. We excluded the articles that do not mention this procedure; those which indicated that the intradiscal injection had happened accidentally during other treatments; those reporting the patient's pain was determined by other causes than the discopathy (facet joint syndrome, tumor, spondylodiscitis).

resultsThirty-one articles dated from 1969 to 2018 met the criteria. The examined population was 6843 subjects, 52.3% male and 47.7% female, with a mean age of 45.9±10.1 years. The techniques are highly variable in terms of procedure: different operators, needle guidance, injection sites, drugs, tilt angle of the needle).

conclusionThe efficacy and the safety of the intradiscal procedures are not easily comparable due to different types of studies and their limited number. Further studies are needed to standardize the intradiscal injection technique/procedure to improve safety, repeatability and effectiveness, and last but not least to reduce peri- and postoperative care and health-care costs.

Indexed as

discopathyguidanceinjectionintradiscal injectionslow back painsafety

Identifiers

PMID33116545
PMCPMC7553660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.