Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116536›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2020

Validity of the Korean Version of DIVA-5: A Semi-Structured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD.

Minha Hong, J J Sandra Kooij, Bongseog Kim, Yoo-Sook Joung, Hanik K Yoo, Eui-Jung Kim, Soyoung Irene Lee, Soo-Young Bhang, Seung Yup Lee, Doug Hyun Han and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Minha HongDepartment of Psychiatry, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4924-1107
J J Sandra KooijPsyQ, Psycho-Medical Programs, Expertise Center Adult ADHD, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Bongseog KimDepartment of Psychiatry, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-2534-6986
Yoo-Sook JoungDepartment of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Hanik K YooDepartment of Clinical Psychiatry, Seoul Brain Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7118-604X
Eui-Jung KimDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6369-5167
Soyoung Irene LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Soo-Young BhangDepartment of Psychiatry, Nowon Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seung Yup LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-4120-5603
Doug Hyun HanDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8314-0767
Young Sik LeeDepartment of Psychiatry, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2161-8232
Geon Ho BahnDepartment of Psychiatry, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3550-0422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was to assess the validity of the Korean version of the semi-structured Diagnostic Interview for Adult ADHD, third edition (DIVA-5). The secondary aim was to compare sociodemographic and psychiatric comorbidities in adult patients with and without a diagnosis of ADHD.

methodsA total of 279 participants were recruited from nine psychiatric outpatient clinics in Korea. All participants were administered the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Plus v.5.0.0, the Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale v1.1 (ASRS-v1.1) Symptom Checklist, and DIVA-5. Diagnosis concordance between two board-certified psychiatrists and DIVA-5 were analysed.

resultsThe DIVA-5 showed a diagnostic accuracy of 92%, a sensitivity of 91.30%, and a specificity of 93.62%. Significant clinical and demographic differences between ADHD and control groups were found.

conclusionThe Korean version of DIVA-5 is a reliable tool for assessing and diagnosing ADHD in adult Korean populations.

Indexed as

adult ADHDDIVA-5Koreanvalidity

Identifiers

PMID33116536
PMCPMC7567566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.