Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116485›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2020

Nanomechanics and Histopathology as Diagnostic Tools to Characterize Freshly Removed Human Brain Tumors.

Mateusz Cieśluk, Katarzyna Pogoda, Piotr Deptuła, Paulina Werel, Alina Kułakowska, Jan Kochanowicz, Zenon Mariak, Tomasz Łysoń, Joanna Reszeć, Robert Bucki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nanomechanical Hallmarks ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mateusz CieślukDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15222, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5931-4376
Katarzyna PogodaInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow PL-31342, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6994-3435
Piotr DeptułaDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15222, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-3553-3774
Paulina WerelDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15276, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1531-8922
Alina KułakowskaDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15276, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5458-2830
Jan KochanowiczDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15276, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0382-6193
Zenon MariakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15276, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-9278
Tomasz ŁysońDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15276, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9757-8276
Joanna ReszećDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15269, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0169-0897
Robert BuckiDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Nanobiomedical Engineering, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok PL-15222, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7664-9226
Medical University of Białystok · PLInstitute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tissue-mechanics environment plays a crucial role in human brain physiological development and the pathogenesis of different diseases, especially cancer. Assessment of alterations in brain mechanical  properties during cancer progression might provide important information about possible tissue abnormalities with clinical relevance.

methodsWith atomic force microscopy (AFM), the stiffness of freshly removed human brain tumor tissue was determined on various regions of the sample and compared to the stiffness of healthy human brain tissue that was removed during neurosurgery to gain access to tumor mass. An advantage of indentation measurement using AFM is the small volume of tissue required and high resolution at the single-cell level.

resultsOur results showed great heterogeneity of stiffness within metastatic cancer or primary high-grade gliomas compared to healthy tissue. That effect was not clearly visible in lower-grade tumors like meningioma.

conclusionCollected data indicate that AFM might serve as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of human brain tissue stiffness in the process of recognizing tumors.

Indexed as

BrainBrain NeoplasmsGliomaHumansMicroscopy, Atomic ForceAFMbrain tumorsglioblastomahuman tissue rheologymechanomarkers

Identifiers

PMID33116485
PMCPMC7547774
OpenAlexW3089482089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.