Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116241›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2020

Innate local response and tissue recovery following application of high density microarray patches to human skin.

David A Muller, Joakim Henricson, S Ben Baker, Totte Togö, Cesar M Jayashi Flores, Pierre A Lemaire, Angus Forster, Chris D Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Exploiting Unique Features of Microneedles to Modulate Immunity.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Micropuncture closure following high density microarray patch application in healthy subjects.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David A MullerSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Building 76 Cooper road, St. Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. d.muller4@uq.edu.au.
Joakim HenricsonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
S Ben BakerVaxxas Pty Ltd, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Totte TogöAllergy Center Linköping, Region Östergötland, Sweden.
Cesar M Jayashi FloresVaxxas Pty Ltd, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Pierre A LemaireVaxxas Pty Ltd, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Angus ForsterVaxxas Pty Ltd, Translational Research Institute, 37 Kent Street, Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Chris D AndersonDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. chris.anderson@regionostergotland.se.
Linköping University · SETranslational Research Institute · AUVaxxas (Australia) · AURegion ÖstergötlandUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of microarray patches for vaccine application has the potential to revolutionise vaccine delivery. Microarray patches (MAP) reduce risks of needle stick injury, do not require reconstitution and have the potential to enhance immune responses using a fractional vaccine dose. To date, the majority of research has focused on vaccine delivery with little characterisation of local skin response and recovery. Here we study in detail the immediate local skin response and recovery of the skin post high density MAP application in 12 individuals receiving 3 MAPs randomly assigned to the forearm and upper arm. Responses were characterised by clinical scoring, dermatoscopy, evaporimetry and tissue viability imaging (TiVi). MAP application resulted in punctures in the epidermis, a significant transepidermal water loss (TEWL), the peak TEWL being concomitant with peak erythema responses visualised by TiVi. TEWL and TiVi responses reduced over time, with TEWL returning to baseline by 48 h and erythema fading over the course of a 7 day period. As MAPs for vaccination move into larger clinical studies more variation of individual subject phenotypic or disease propensity will be encountered which will require consideration both in regard to reliability of dose delivery and degree of inherent skin response.

Indexed as

EpidermisErythemaVaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedTransdermal PatchVaccinationVaccines

Identifiers

PMID33116241
PMCPMC7595201
OpenAlexW3095930150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.