ArticleScientific reports2020
A new glioma grading model based on histopathology and Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 mRNA expression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-throughput spheroid profiling reveals BMP-driven rewiring of glioma cell death responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Multi-Layered Analysis of TGF-β Signaling and Regulation via DNA Methylation and microRNAs in Astrocytic Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Robust Cluster Prediction Across Data Types Validates Association of Sex and Therapy Response in GBM.Cancers · 2025Article
- A Risk Score Signature Consisting of Six Immune Genes Predicts Overall Survival in Patients with Lower-Grade Gliomas.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Construction of an immune-related gene signature for the prognosis and diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- A Composite Bioinformatic Analysis to Explore Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Related Prognostic Marker and Potential Pathogenic Mechanisms in Glioma by Integrating Multiomics Data.Journal of oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glioma, the most common form of primary malignant brain tumors, is graded based solely on histopathological appearance, which has led to prognostic discrepancies. This study aimed to establish a new glioma grading model by analyzing the expression of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 (BMP2) mRNA in patients with gliomas as well, named the Histopathological-BMP2 (HB) system. Clinical information was collected from 692 patients from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas database. According to pathological glioma subtypes and the expression of BMP2 mRNA in tumor tissues, the new subtypes HBs, HBh, HBm and HB1 were established, with BMP2 expression highest in HBs and lowest in HB1. Survival periods were analyzed. Based on this, the expression of three BMP2 receptors (BMPR1A, BMPR1B, and BMPR2) was also analyzed, which was related to the prognosis of patients. This new classification model was validated in further groups of patients from the CGGA database (n = 291) and the Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 625). A new glioma grade (HB grade) based on histopathology and BMP2 expression can predict the prognosis of glioma patients, with BMPR1B and BMPR2 expression indicating a different prognosis in different types of gliomas. The higher the concentration of BMP2, the better the prognosis of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.