ArticleScientific reports2020
Probing coordinated co-culture cancer related motility through differential micro-compartmentalized elastic substrates.
Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Optical System for Strain Drop Measurement of Osteosarcoma Cells on Substrates with Different Stiffness.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Acousto-holographic reconstruction of whole-cell stiffness maps.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Discrimination between NSIP- and IPF-Derived Fibroblasts Based on Multi-Parameter Characterization of Their Growth, Morphology and Physic-Chemical Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell development and behavior are driven by internal genetic programming, but the external microenvironment is increasingly recognized as a significant factor in cell differentiation, migration, and in the case of cancer, metastatic progression. Yet it remains unclear how the microenvironment influences cell processes, especially when examining cell motility. One factor that affects cell motility is cell mechanics, which is known to be related to substrate stiffness. Examining how cells interact with each other in response to mechanically differential substrates would allow an increased understanding of their coordinated cell motility. In order to probe the effect of substrate stiffness on tumor related cells in greater detail, we created hard-soft-hard (HSH) polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with alternating regions of different stiffness (200 and 800 kPa). We then cultured WI-38 fibroblasts and A549 epithelial cells to probe their motile response to the substrates. We found that when the 2 cell types were exposed simultaneously to the same substrate, fibroblasts moved at an increased speed over epithelial cells. Furthermore, the HSH substrate allowed us to physically guide and separate the different cell types based on their relative motile speed. We believe that this method and results will be important in a diversity of areas including mechanical microenvironment, cell motility, and cancer biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.