Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33116161›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

ThicknessTool: automated ImageJ retinal layer thickness and profile in digital images.

Daniel E Maidana, Shoji Notomi, Takashi Ueta, Tianna Zhou, Danica Joseph, Cassandra Kosmidou, Josep Maria Caminal-Mitjana, Joan W Miller, Demetrios G Vavvas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Full-thickness macular holes after surgical repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachments: incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel E MaidanaFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Shoji NotomiFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Takashi UetaFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tianna ZhouFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Danica JosephFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Cassandra KosmidouFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Josep Maria Caminal-MitjanaFrom the Retina Service, Bellvitge Hospital, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan W MillerFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Demetrios G VavvasFrom the Retina Service, Angiogenesis Lab, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Demetrios_Vavvas@MEEI.HARVARD.EDU.

Funding

P30 Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY014104 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Eric A Pierce · 2002 to 2026
$15.1M
Necroptosis and Neuroprotection in AMDR21EY023079 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI VAVVAS, DEMETRIOS · 2013 to 2014
$404k
NEI NIH HHS EY014104NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014104NEI NIH HHS R21 EY023079NEI NIH HHS R21EY023079-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To develop an automated retina layer thickness measurement tool for the ImageJ platform, to quantitate nuclear layers following the retina contour. We developed the ThicknessTool (TT), an automated thickness measurement plugin for the ImageJ platform. To calibrate TT, we created a calibration dataset of mock binary skeletonized mask images with increasing thickness masks and different rotations. Following, we created a training dataset and performed an agreement analysis of thickness measurements between TT and two masked manual observers. Finally, we tested the performance of TT measurements in a validation dataset of retinal detachment images. In the calibration dataset, there were no differences in layer thickness between measured and known thickness masks, with an overall coefficient of variation of 0.00%. Training dataset measurements of immunofluorescence retina nuclear layers disclosed no significant differences between TT and any observer's average outer nuclear layer (ONL) (p = 0.998), inner nuclear layer (INL) (p = 0.807), and ONL/INL ratio (p = 0.944) measurements. Agreement analysis showed that bias between TT vs. observers' mean was lower than between any observers' mean against each other in the ONL (0.77 ± 0.34 µm vs 3.25 ± 0.33 µm) and INL (1.59 ± 0.28 µm vs 2.82 ± 0.36 µm). Validation dataset showed that TT can detect significant and true ONL thinning (p = 0.006), more sensitive than manual measurement capabilities (p = 0.069). ThicknessTool can measure retina nuclear layers thickness in a fast, accurate, and precise manner with multi-platform capabilities. In addition, the TT can be customized to user preferences and is freely available to download.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSoftwareTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceRetinaRetinal Detachment

Identifiers

PMID33116161
PMCPMC7595229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.