ArticleInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021
Associations of the Prognostic Nutritional Index with the Cardiac Function and Survival after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
Article in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Immune Nutrition Indices with the Risk of All-Cause Mortality and Cardiovascular Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure in the NHANES (1999-2018).Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Nutritional Status Predicts the Length of Stay and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Electrotherapy Procedures.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Prognostic Nutrition Index and New York Heart Association Classification in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A RCSCD-TCM Study.Journal of inflammation research · 2022Article
- The change in nutritional status is related to cardiovascular events in patients with pacemaker implantation: A 4-year follow-up study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The relationship between changes in the nutritional status after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the prognosis has not been fully elucidated. We aimed to evaluate the changes in the nutritional status as assessed by the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and their associations with the improvement in the cardiac function and subsequent clinical outcomes. Methods The study population consisted of 119 patients with a CRT-device. They were divided into 2 groups, based on whether their PNI had increased at 6 months after CRT-device implantation (positive ΔPNI group, n=73) or not (negative ΔPNI group, n=46). The left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured before and six months after CRT-device implantation. We compared the changes in the cardiac function and prevalence of adverse events (re-hospitalization due to worsening heart failure or all cause death) between the two groups. Results In the positive ΔPNI group, the LVEDV (186±93 mL vs. 149±71 mL, p<0.05) and LVESV (134±75 mL vs. 98±62 mL, p<0.05) were significantly decreased 6 months after CRT-device implantation. In addition, the LVEF (31±11% vs. 37±12%, p<0.05) was significantly increased after CRT-device implantation. In the negative ΔPNI group, no significant changes were observed in any echocardiographic parameters. During a median follow-up period of 914 days, there were 67 (56.3%) adverse events. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the positive ΔPNI group was associated with a lower risk of adverse events than the negative ΔPNI group (50.6% vs. 65.2%, log-rank p=0.042). Conclusion Our results suggest that improvement in the cardiac function after CRT-device implantation is associated with increases in the PNI, resulting in favorable outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.