Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115897›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Best practice when working with suicidal behaviour and self-harm in primary care: a qualitative exploration of young people's perspectives.

India Bellairs-Walsh, Yael Perry, Karolina Krysinska, Sadhbh J Byrne, Alexandra Boland, Maria Michail, Michelle Lamblin, Kerry L Gibson, Ashleigh Lin, Tina Yutong Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Potential Harms of Responding to Youth Suicide Risk in Schools.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The functions of self-harm in young people and their perspectives about future general practitioner-led care: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

India Bellairs-WalshOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia india.bellairs-walsh@orygen.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-9480-7881
Yael PerryTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Karolina KrysinskaOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sadhbh J ByrneOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Alexandra BolandOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Maria MichailSchool of Psychology, Institute for Mental Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michelle LamblinOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kerry L GibsonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ashleigh LinTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Tina Yutong LiOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Sarah HetrickOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jo RobinsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesGeneral practitioners (GPs) have a key role in supporting young people who present with suicidal behaviour/self-harm. However, little is known about young people's opinions and experiences related to GPs' practices for such presentations, and their decisions to disclose suicidal behaviour/self-harm to GPs. Additionally, existing guidelines for the management of suicide risk and/or self-harm have not incorporated young people's perspectives. This study aimed to explore young people's views and experiences related to the identification, assessment and care of suicidal behaviour and self-harm in primary care settings with GPs. DESIGN, SETTING AND

participantsTwo qualitative focus groups were conducted in Perth, Western Australia, with 10 young people in total (

resultsFive major themes were identified from the focus groups. (1) Young people wanted a collaborative dialogue with GPs, which included being asked about suicidal behaviour/self-harm, informed of treatment processes and having autonomy in decision making; (2) young people were concerned with a loss of privacy when disclosing suicidal behaviour/self-harm; (3) young people viewed labels and assessments as problematic and reductionist-disliking the terms 'risk' and 'risk assessment', and assessment approaches that are binary and non-holistic; (4) young people highlighted the importance of GPs' attitudes, with a genuine connection, attentiveness and a non-judgemental demeanour seen as paramount; and (5) young people wanted to be provided with practical support and resources, followed-up, and for GPs to be competent when working with suicidal behaviour/self-harm presentations.

conclusionsOur study identified several concerns and recommendations young people have regarding the identification, assessment and care of suicidal behaviour/self-harm in primary care settings. Taken together, these findings may inform the development of resources for GPs, and support progress in youth-oriented best practice.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicidal IdeationAdolescentAdultAge FactorsHumansPsychology, AdolescentQualitative ResearchWestern AustraliaYoung Adultchild & adolescent psychiatrymental healthprimary carequalitative researchquality in health caresuicide & self-harm

Identifiers

PMID33115897
PMCPMC7594366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.