Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115753›Full record

ReviewESMO open2020

Gender-specific aspects related to type of fertility preservation strategies and access to fertility care.

Marta Perachino, Claudia Massarotti, Maria Grazia Razeti, Francesca Parisi, Luca Arecco, Alessandra Damassi, Piero Fregatti, Cinzia Solinas, Matteo Lambertini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ESMO open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The experience of fertility preservation decision-making in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Childbearing in women diagnosed with cancer during reproductive age.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta PerachinoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Claudia MassarottiPhysiopatology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Maria Grazia RazetiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Francesca ParisiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Luca AreccoDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Alessandra DamassiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
Piero FregattiDepartment of Surgery, U.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Integrated Diagnostic Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
Cinzia SolinasMedical Oncology, Azienda Tutela della Salute Sardegna, Hospital A. Segni Ozieri, Sassari, Italy.
Matteo LambertiniDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Liguria, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy. Electronic address: matteo.lambertini@unige.it.
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivorship is an area of paramount importance to be addressed as early as possible after cancer diagnosis by all health care providers. On this regard, cancer care in young patients often poses several age-related considerations among which fertility and pregnancy-related issues have a crucial role. According to the available guidelines on the topic, all patients with cancer diagnosed during their reproductive years should be provided a proper oncofertility counselling before starting anticancer treatments. This is an important step in order to inform patients about the potential treatment-induced gonadotoxicity and the available strategies for fertility preservation so that they can be referred as early as possible to fertility specialists if potentially interested in these options.In this manuscript, we aim to provide an up to date overview on the available efficacy and safety data with the main strategies for fertility preservation in male and female cancer patients in order to help optimising the oncofertility counselling performed by healthcare providers involved in cancer care and dealing with young patients. In male patients with cancer, sperm cryopreservation is the standard technique for fertility preservation. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and temporary ovarian suppression with luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy are the main options in female patients with cancer.A multidisciplinary management building a strong network between fertility and oncology/haematology units is crucial to properly address fertility care in all young patients with cancer, at both diagnosis and during oncologic follow-up. Discussing fertility and pregnancy-related issues with young patients with cancer has to be considered mandatory nowadays keeping in mind that returning to a normal life (including the possibility to have a family and to live with as few side effects as possible) should be considered an important ambition in cancer care in the 21st century .

Indexed as

Fertility PreservationNeoplasmsCryopreservationFemaleHumansMaleOocytesOvaryPregnancycryopreservationfertilityoncofertilitypregnancyyoung adult cancer

Identifiers

PMID33115753
PMCPMC7594356
OpenAlexW3096100199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.