Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115620›Full record

ReviewTransfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis2020

Non-invasive prenatal testing for management of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn induced by maternal alloimmunisation.

Catherine A Hyland, Helen O'Brien, Robert L Flower, Glenn J Gardener

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Noninvasive fetal blood group antigen genotyping.Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Extension of Homo Sapiens Adapting to Every Environment with Divertgent Phenotypes: Blood Type Incompatible in Pregnancy as an Abaxial Phenomenon.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine A HylandClinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: CHyland@redcrossblood.org.au.
Helen O'BrienClinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
Robert L FlowerClinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia; School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Glenn J GardenerMater Health Services, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Australian Red Cross Lifeblood · AUMater Health Services · AUQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis reduces the risk of RhD negative women becoming alloimmunised to the RhD antigen and is a major preventative strategy in reducing the burden of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). HDFN also arises from other maternal red cell antibodies, with the most clinically significant, after anti-D, being anti-K, anti-c and anti-E. Among the 39 human blood group systems advanced genomic technologies are still revealing novel or rare antigens involved in maternal alloimmunisation. Where clinically significant maternal antibodies are detected in pregnancy, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of cell-free fetal DNA provides a safe way to assess the fetal blood group antigen status. This provides information as to the risk for HDFN and thus guides management strategies. In many countries, NIPT fetal RHD genotyping as a diagnostic test using real-time PCR has already been integrated into routine clinical care for the management of women with allo-anti-D to assess the risk for HDFN. In addition, screening programs have been established to provide antenatal assessment of the fetal RHD genotype in non-alloimmunised RhD negative pregnant women to target anti-D prophylaxis to those predicted to be carrying an RhD positive baby. Both diagnostic and screening assays exhibit high accuracy (over 99 %). NIPT fetal genotyping for atypical (other than RhD) blood group antigens presents more challenges as most arise from a single nucleotide variant. Recent studies show potential for genomic and digital technologies to provide a personalised medicine approach with NIPT to assess fetal blood group status for women with other (non-D) red cell antibodies to manage the risk for HDFN.

Indexed as

Anemia, Hemolytic, AutoimmuneErythroblastosis, FetalFemaleGenetic TestingHumansIsoantibodiesPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisIsoantibodiesBlood group and genotypingCell-free fetal DNAHaemolytic disease of the fetus and newbornRed cell alloimmunisation

Identifiers

PMID33115620
OpenAlexW3087092328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.