Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115412›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2020

Experience repatriation of citizens from epicentre using commercial flights during COVID-19 pandemic.

Sarah Shaikh Abdul Karim, Fariza Anis Md Tahir, Umul Khair Mohamad, Marlina Abu Bakar, Khairul Nizam Mohamad, Maria Suleiman, Hussein Omar Khan, Julina Md Noor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. COVID-19 repatriation programs - Classification and optimization models.Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. A topic modeling analysis on the early phase of COVID-19 response in the Philippines.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah Shaikh Abdul KarimPrehospital Care Services Unit, Hospital Sg Buloh, 47000, Sg Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia. sarahabdkarim@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7624-8326
Fariza Anis Md TahirPrehospital Care Services Unit, Hospital Serdang, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Umul Khair MohamadPrehospital Care Services Unit, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Marlina Abu BakarPrehospital Care Services Unit, Hospital Serdang, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Khairul Nizam MohamadEmergency and Trauma Department, Hospital Kemaman, Chukai, Terengganu, Malaysia.
Maria SuleimanDisaster, Outbreak, Crisis and Emergency Sector, Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Hussein Omar KhanNational Disaster Management Agency, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
Julina Md NoorEmergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
Serdang Hospital · MYHospital Kemaman · MYHospital Kuala Lumpur · MYHospital Sungai Buloh · MYMinistry of Health · MYNational Space Agency · MYUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, many countries instituted closure of borders from international and local travels. Stranded citizens appeal to their governments to embark on citizen repatriation missions. Between February and April 2020, the Government of Malaysia directed repatriation of its citizens from China, Iran, Italy and Indonesia. We describe the preparation and execution of the repatriation mission using chartered commercial aircraft. The mission objectives were to repatriate as many citizens based on aircraft capacity and prevent onboard transmission of the disease to flight personnel.

resultsFive repatriation missions performed was led by the National Agency for Disaster Management (NADMA) with the Ministry of Health providing technical expertise. A total of 432 citizens were repatriated from the missions. The operations were divided into four phases: the pre-boarding screening phase, the boarding and in-flight phase, the reception phase and the quarantine phase. The commercial aircraft used were from two different commercial airlines. Each mission had flight crew members between 10 and 17 people. There were 82 positive cases detected among the repatriated citizens. There was a single positive case of a healthcare worker involved in the mission, based on the sample taken on arrival of the flight. There were no infections involving flight team members.

conclusionMedical flight crew must be familiar with aircraft fittings that differ from one commercial airline to another as it influences infection control practices. A clear understanding of socio-political situation of a country, transmission routes of a pathogen, disease presentation, and knowledge of aviation procedures, aircraft engineering and design is of great importance in preparing for such missions. Our approach of multidiscipline team involvement managed to allow us to provide and execute the operations successfully.

Indexed as

AircraftDisaster medicine planningInfectious disease medicinePrevention and controlSARS coronavirusTransport medicine

Identifiers

PMID33115412
PMCPMC7594296
OpenAlexW3095226012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.