Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115327›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2021

Anger and confrontation during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey in the UK.

Louise E Smith, Bobby Duffy, Vivienne Moxham-Hall, Lucy Strang, Simon Wessely, G James Rubin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perceived risk, emotions, and stress in response to COVID-19: The interplay of media use and partisanship.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Psychology of envy towards medical colleagues.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Louise E SmithInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-2564
Bobby DuffyFaculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, London WC2B 2BG, UK.
Vivienne Moxham-HallFaculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, London WC2B 2BG, UK.
Lucy StrangFaculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, London WC2B 2BG, UK.
Simon WesselyInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
G James RubinInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ, UK.
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate factors associated with anger or confronting others due to COVID-19.

designOnline cross-sectional survey.

settingData were collected between 17 and 20 July 2020.

participantsA total of 2237 participants living in the UK aged 16-75 years.

main outcome measuresReporting having had arguments, felt angry or fallen out with others because of COVID-19. Reporting having confronted or reported someone to the authorities, or that you had been confronted or reported to the authorities, for not wearing a face covering; not keeping your distance from others or being in too large a group; or alternatively following recommended measures too carefully. We used logistic regression analyses to identify factors associated with anger and confrontation.

resultsMost participants reported having had arguments, feeling angry or fallen out with others because of COVID-19 (56%, n = 1255). Twenty-two percent (n = 500) of participants reported that they had confronted or reported someone. Fourteen percent (n = 304) of participants reported that they had been confronted or reported by someone. Confronting someone, having been confronted and feeling angry or having had arguments were strongly associated with each other. Anger and confrontation were associated with younger age, greater likelihood of experiencing significant financial difficulties due to the pandemic, greater perceived risk of COVID-19 and getting information about COVID-19 from social media.

conclusionsMeasures put in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19 have caused considerable strain. Increased support, clear messaging on the rationale for easing restrictions and combatting misinformation on social media may all help decrease tension.

Indexed as

AngerCommunicable Disease ControlCOVID-19Interpersonal RelationsPandemicsAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2communityconflictcorrosionGovernment measureslockdowntension

Identifiers

PMID33115327
PMCPMC7876655
OpenAlexW3097290945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.