Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115320›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2020

Abnormal Pulmonary Venous Filling: An Adjunct Feature in the Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram Assessment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension.

Deepa Gopalan, Anna Nordgren-Rogberg, Elizabeth Phuong Vi Le, Holly Pavey, Jason Tarkin, Sven Nyrén, William Auger, Peter Lindholm

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Highlights from the International Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension Congress 2021.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Deepa GopalanDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Anna Nordgren-RogbergDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
Elizabeth Phuong Vi LeDepartment of Medicine University of Cambridge United Kingdom.
Holly PaveyDivision of Experimental Medicine and Immunotherapeutics University of Cambridge United Kingdom.
Jason TarkinDepartment of Medicine University of Cambridge United Kingdom.
Sven NyrénDepartment of Radiology Solna Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden.
William AugerTemple University Hospital Philadelphia PA.
Peter LindholmDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden.
University of Cambridge · GBKarolinska University Hospital · SEImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKarolinska Institutet · SETemple University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Hypodense filling defects within the pulmonary veins on computed tomography described as pulmonary vein sign (PVS) have been noted in acute pulmonary embolism and shown to be associated with poor prognosis. We evaluated venous flow abnormalities in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) to determine its usefulness in the computed tomography assessment of CTEPH. Methods and Results Blinded retrospective computed tomography analysis of 50 proximal CTEPH cases and 3 control groups-50 acute pulmonary embolism, 50 nonthromboembolic cohort, and 50 pulmonary arterial hypertension. Venous flow reduction was assessed by the following: (1) presence of a filling defect of at least 2 cm in a pulmonary vein draining into the left atrium, and (2) left atrium attenuation (>160 Hounsfield units). PVS was most prevalent in CTEPH. Compared with all controls, sensitivity and specificity of PVS for CTEPH is 78.0% and 85.3% (95% CI, 64.0-88.5 and 78.6-90.6, respectively) versus 34.0% and 70.7% (95% CI, 21.2-48.8 and 62.7-77.8) in acute pulmonary embolism, 8.0% and 62% (95% CI, 2.2-19.2 and 53.7-69.8) in nonthromboembolic and 2.0% and 60% (95% CI, 0.1-10.7 and 51.7-67.9) in pulmonary arterial hypertension. In CTEPH, lobar and segmental arterial occlusive disease was most commonly associated with corresponding absent venous flow. PVS detection was highly reproducible (Kappa=0.96, 95% CI, 0.90-1.01,

Indexed as

AdultAgedChronic DiseaseComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansHypertension, PulmonaryMaleMiddle AgedPulmonary EmbolismPulmonary VeinsRegional Blood FlowRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificitychronic thromboembolic diseaseCTEPHCTPApulmonary hypertensionpulmonary vein sign

Identifiers

PMID33115320
PMCPMC7763423
OpenAlexW3097776467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.