Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115272›Full record

ReviewArteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology2021

Computationally Driven Discovery in Coagulation.

Kathryn G Link, Michael T Stobb, Dougald M Monroe, Aaron L Fogelson, Keith B Neeves, Suzanne S Sindi, Karin Leiderman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Coagulo-Net: Enhancing the mathematical modeling of blood coagulation using physics-informed neural networks.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Decoding thrombosis through code: a review of computational models.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn G LinkDepartment of Mathematics, University of California Davis (K.G.L.).
Michael T StobbDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Coe College, Cedar Rapids, IA (M.T.S.).
Dougald M MonroeDepartment of Medicine, UNC Blood Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (D.M.M.).
Aaron L FogelsonDepartments of Mathematics and Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (A.L.F.).
Keith B NeevesDepartments of Bioengineering and Pediatrics, Section of Hematology, Oncology, and Bone Marrow Transplant, Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, University of Colorado, Denver (K.B.N.).
Suzanne S SindiDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of California, Merced (S.S.S.).
Karin LeidermanDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden (K.L.).
Coe College · USColorado School of Mines · USIndiana Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of California, Merced · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

An integrated computational and experimental approach to understanding the hemostatic response during treatment of bleedingR01HL151984 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FOGELSON, AARON L, LEIDERMAN, KARIN · 2020 to 2023
$2.8M
A Systems Biology Approach to Predicting Bleeding in HemophiliaR01HL120728 · NHLBI · COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES · PI DI PAOLA, JORGE A, FOGELSON, AARON L · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL120728NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL151984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bleeding frequency and severity within clinical categories of hemophilia A are highly variable and the origin of this variation is unknown. Solving this mystery in coagulation requires the generation and analysis of large data sets comprised of experimental outputs or patient samples, both of which are subject to limited availability. In this review, we describe how a computationally driven approach bypasses such limitations by generating large synthetic patient data sets. These data sets were created with a mechanistic mathematical model, by varying the model inputs, clotting factor, and inhibitor concentrations, within normal physiological ranges. Specific mathematical metrics were chosen from the model output, used as a surrogate measure for bleeding severity, and statistically analyzed for further exploration and hypothesis generation. We highlight results from our recent study that employed this computationally driven approach to identify FV (factor V) as a key modifier of thrombin generation in mild to moderate hemophilia A, which was confirmed with complementary experimental assays. The mathematical model was used further to propose a potential mechanism for these observations whereby thrombin generation is rescued in FVIII-deficient plasma due to reduced substrate competition between FV and FVIII for FXa (activated factor X).

Indexed as

Blood CoagulationComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalAnimalsBinding, CompetitiveDatasets as TopicFactor VFactor VIIIFactor XaHemophilia AHumansMachine LearningProtein BindingThrombinF8 protein, humanFactor VFactor VIIIFactor XaThrombinalgorithmshemophilia Amachine learningplasmathrombin

Identifiers

PMID33115272
PMCPMC7769924
OpenAlexW3096393672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.