Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33115232›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry letters2020

Plasmonic Electronic Raman Scattering as Internal Standard for Spatial and Temporal Calibration in Quantitative Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.

Wonil Nam, Yuming Zhao, Junyeob Song, Seied Ali Safiabadi Tali, Seju Kang, Wenqi Zhu, Henri J Lezec, Amit Agrawal, Peter J Vikesland, Wei Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. DC vs AC Electrokinetics-Driven Nanoplasmonic Raman Monitoring of Charged Analyte Molecules in Ionic Solutions.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Wonil NamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-3049
Yuming ZhaoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
Junyeob SongDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6369-823X
Seied Ali Safiabadi TaliDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
Seju KangDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Critical Technology and Applied Science Sustainable Nanotechnology Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.
Wenqi ZhuPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.
Henri J LezecPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-1333
Amit AgrawalPhysical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9619-7623
Peter J VikeslandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Institute of Critical Technology and Applied Science Sustainable Nanotechnology Center, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2654-5132
Wei ZhouDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5257-3885

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) still faces difficulties in quantitative analysis because of its susceptibility to local optical field variations at plasmonic hotspots in metallo-dielectric nanostructures. Current SERS calibration approaches using Raman tags have inherent limitations due to spatial occupation competition with analyte molecules, spectral interference with analyte Raman peaks, and photodegradation. Herein, we report that plasmon-enhanced electronic Raman scattering (ERS) signals from metal can serve as an internal standard for spatial and temporal calibration of molecular Raman scattering (MRS) signals from analyte molecules at the same hotspots, enabling rigorous quantitative SERS analysis. We observe a linear dependence between ERS and MRS signal intensities upon spatial and temporal variations of excitation optical fields, manifesting the |

Identifiers

PMID33115232
PMCPMC8141369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.