Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33114756›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Future of Direct Cardiac Reprogramming: Any

Leyre López-Muneta, Josu Miranda-Arrubla, Xonia Carvajal-Vergara

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Cell Programming for Cardiovascular Disease Modeling and Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Cardiac microRNAs: diagnostic and therapeutic potential.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Generation of NKX2.5Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leyre López-MunetaRegenerative Medicine Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain.
Josu Miranda-ArrublaRegenerative Medicine Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain.
Xonia Carvajal-VergaraRegenerative Medicine Program, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Navarra, University of Navarra, 31009 Pamplona, Spain.
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

PID2019-107150RB-I00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 PID2019-107150RB-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct cardiac reprogramming has emerged as a novel therapeutic approach to treat and regenerate injured hearts through the direct conversion of fibroblasts into cardiac cells. Most studies have focused on the reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced cardiomyocytes (iCMs). The first study in which this technology was described, showed that at least a combination of three transcription factors, GATA4, MEF2C and TBX5 (GMT cocktail), was required for the reprogramming into iCMs in vitro using mouse cells. However, this was later demonstrated to be insufficient for the reprogramming of human cells and additional factors were required. Thereafter, most studies have focused on implementing reprogramming efficiency and obtaining fully reprogrammed and functional iCMs, by the incorporation of other transcription factors, microRNAs or small molecules to the original GMT cocktail. In this respect, great advances have been made in recent years. However, there is still no consensus on which of these GMT-based varieties is best, and robust and highly reproducible protocols are still urgently required, especially in the case of human cells. On the other hand, apart from CMs, other cells such as endothelial and smooth muscle cells to form new blood vessels will be fundamental for the correct reconstruction of damaged cardiac tissue. With this aim, several studies have centered on the direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced cardiac progenitor cells (iCPCs) able to give rise to all myocardial cell lineages. Especially interesting are reports in which multipotent and highly expandable mouse iCPCs have been obtained, suggesting that clinically relevant amounts of these cells could be created. However, as of yet, this has not been achieved with human iCPCs, and exactly what stage of maturity is appropriate for a cell therapy product remains an open question. Nonetheless, the major concern in regenerative medicine is the poor retention, survival, and engraftment of transplanted cells in the cardiac tissue. To circumvent this issue, several cell pre-conditioning approaches are currently being explored. As an alternative to cell injection, in vivo reprogramming may face fewer barriers for its translation to the clinic. This approach has achieved better results in terms of efficiency and iCMs maturity in mouse models, indicating that the heart environment can favor this process. In this context, in recent years some studies have focused on the development of safer delivery systems such as Sendai virus, Adenovirus, chemical cocktails or nanoparticles. This article provides an in-depth review of the in vitro and in vivo cardiac reprograming technology used in mouse and human cells to obtain iCMs and iCPCs, and discusses what challenges still lie ahead and what hurdles are to be overcome before results from this field can be transferred to the clinical settings.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCells, CulturedCellular ReprogrammingCellular Reprogramming TechniquesCulture MediaHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMiceMyocytes, CardiacTranscription FactorsCulture MediaTranscription Factorscardiovascular diseases 4cardiovascular regeneration 6cardiovascular repair 5direct reprogramming 1iCMs (induced cardiomyocytes) 2iCPCs (induced cardiac progenitor cells) 3

Identifiers

PMID33114756
PMCPMC7663133
OpenAlexW3096100338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.