ReviewCancers2020
Ruxolitinib-Associated Infections in Polycythemia Vera: Review of the Literature, Clinical Significance, and Recommendations.
Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- CO-Rebreathing in Essential Thrombocythemia and Polycythemia Vera. A Revival of an Old Methodology to Improve Diagnosis and Phlebotomy Decisions.Cancer medicine · 2026Review
- A paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera. The initial early use of recombinant interferon-alpha.Leukemia · 2026Review
- Prospective, non-interventional study of ruxolitinib therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera - German real-world data (PaVe study).Annals of hematology · 2026Observational
- Low-dose ruxolitinib as first-line therapy for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) increases the risk of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation but not posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD).Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Article
- Post-translational Modifications in Proteins: Prediction Methods, Biological Functions, and Diseases.MedComm · 2026Review
- Ruxolitinib-Treated Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Real-World Infectious Outcomes and Preventive Practices from a Single Center.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Expert Perspective: Hematologic Malignancies and Vasculitis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Pulmonary Coccidioidomycosis in a Ruxolitinib-Treated Polycythemia Vera Patient: A Case Study and Literature Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Cavitary lung lesions caused byBMJ case reports · 2024Article
- Management of polycythemia vera: A survey of treatment patterns in Italy.European journal of haematology · 2023Article
- New Applications of JAK/STAT Inhibitors in Pediatrics: Current Use of Ruxolitinib.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- JAK2 in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Still a Protagonist.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Disseminated blastomycosis in a patient with polycythemia vera on ruxolitinib.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Cryptococcal fungemia and Mycobacterium haemophilum cellulitis in a patient receiving ruxolitinib: a case report and literature review.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Review
- T Helper Cell Lineage-Defining Transcription Factors: Potent Targets for Specific GVHD Therapy?Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- Immune Dysregulation and Infectious Complications in MPN Patients Treated With JAK Inhibitors.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ruxolitinib (RUX), a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved for second-line therapy in patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are resistant or intolerant to hydroxyurea. Due to the immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive effect of RUX, there is an increased susceptibility to infections. However, an increased risk of infection is inherent to even untreated myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). To obtain more information on the clinical significance of RUX-associated infections in PV, we reviewed the available literature. There is no evidence-based approach to managing infection risks. Most data on RUX-associated infections are available for MF. In all studies, the infection rates in the RUX and control groups were fairly similar, with the exception of infections with the varicella zoster virus (VZV). However, individual cases of bilateral toxoplasmosis retinitis, disseminated molluscum contagiosum, or a mycobacterium tuberculosis infection or a hepatitis B reactivation are reported. A careful assessment of the risk of infection for PV patients is required at the initial presentation and before the start of RUX. Screening for hepatitis B is recommended in all patients. The risk of RUX-associated infections is lower with PV than with MF, but compared to a normal population there is an increased risk of VZV infection. However, primary VZV prophylaxis for PV patients is not recommended, while secondary prophylaxis can be considered individually. As early treatment is most effective for VZV, patients should be properly informed and trained to seek medical advice immediately if cutaneous signs of VZV develop. Vaccination against influenza, herpes zoster, and pneumococci should be considered in all PV patients at risk of infection, especially if RUX treatment is planned. Current recommendations do not support adjusting or discontinuing JAK inhibition in MPN patients to reduce the risk of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.