Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33114694›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Enzymatic Dissociation Induces Transcriptional and Proteotype Bias in Brain Cell Populations.

Daniele Mattei, Andranik Ivanov, Marc van Oostrum, Stanislav Pantelyushin, Juliet Richetto, Flavia Mueller, Michal Beffinger, Linda Schellhammer, Johannes Vom Berg, Bernd Wollscheid and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Decoding neurodegeneration one cell at a time.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniele MatteiInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Andranik IvanovCore Unit Bioinformatics, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Marc van OostrumInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology and Department for Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8747-9787
Stanislav PantelyushinInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3490-3860
Juliet RichettoInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8313-3348
Flavia MuellerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Michal BeffingerInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.
Linda SchellhammerInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.
Johannes Vom BergInstitute of Laboratory Animal Science, University of Zurich, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4086-1564
Bernd WollscheidInstitute of Molecular Systems Biology and Department for Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3923-1610
Dieter BeuleCore Unit Bioinformatics, Berlin Institute of Health, Charité-Universitaetsmedizin, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
Rosa Chiara PaolicelliDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Lausanne, Rue du Bugnon 7, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6851-0849
Urs MeyerInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Zurich-Vetsuisse, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHETH Zurich · CHBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

ETH grant ETH-25 15-2European Research Council 804949Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_188524; PZ00P3_180099Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_160259Stiftung Synapsis Alzheimer Forschung Schweiz AFS to RCPUniversity of Zurich Forschungskredit K-51503-05-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Different cell isolation techniques exist for transcriptomic and proteotype profiling of brain cells. Here, we provide a systematic investigation of the influence of different cell isolation protocols on transcriptional and proteotype profiles in mouse brain tissue by taking into account single-cell transcriptomics of brain cells, proteotypes of microglia and astrocytes, and flow cytometric analysis of microglia. We show that standard enzymatic digestion of brain tissue at 37 °C induces profound and consistent alterations in the transcriptome and proteotype of neuronal and glial cells, as compared to an optimized mechanical dissociation protocol at 4 °C. These findings emphasize the risk of introducing technical biases and biological artifacts when implementing enzymatic digestion-based isolation methods for brain cell analyses.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell SeparationChromatography, LiquidEnzymesFlow CytometryGene Expression ProfilingGliomaHumansMaleMiceMicrogliaNeoplasm TransplantationProteomicsEnzymesastrocytesenzymatic digestionmicrogliamicroglia isolationneuronsprotocolsingle-cell sequencing

Identifiers

PMID33114694
PMCPMC7663484
OpenAlexW3097563614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.