Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33114401›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Reliability and Validity of the Modified Korean Version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (mKCFQ11).

Yo-Chan Ahn, Jin-Seok Lee, Chang-Gue Son

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Evaluating myelophil, a 30% ethanol extract ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yo-Chan AhnDepartment of Health Service Management, Daejeon University, Daejeon 300-716, Korea.
Jin-Seok LeeDepartment of Korean Medicine, Institute of Bioscience and Integrative Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon 300-716, Korea.
Chang-Gue SonDepartment of Korean Medicine, Institute of Bioscience and Integrative Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon 300-716, Korea.
Daejeon University · KR

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2018R1A6A1A03025221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatigue can accompany various diseases; however, fatigue itself is a key symptom for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Due to the absence of biological parameters for the diagnosis and severity of CFS, the assessment tool for the degree of fatigue is very important. This study aims to verify the reliability and validity of the modified Korean version of the Chalder Fatigue Scale (mKCFQ11). This study was performed using data from 97 participants (Male: 37, Female: 60) enrolled in a clinical trial for an intervention of CFS. The analyses of the coefficient between the mKCFQ11 score and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) or the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at two time points (baseline and 12 weeks) as well as their changed values were conducted. The mKCFQ11 showed strong reliability, as evidenced by the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.967 for the whole item and two subclasses (0.963 for physical and 0.958 for mental fatigue) along with the suitable validity of the mKCFQ11 structure shown by the principal component analysis. The mKCFQ11 scores also strongly correlated (higher than 0.7) with the VAS, FSS and SF-36 on all data from baseline and 12 weeks and changed values. This study demonstrated the clinical usefulness of the mKCFQ11 instrument, particularly in assessing the severity of fatigue and the evaluation of treatments for patients suffering from CFS.

Indexed as

chalder fatigue scalechronic fatigue syndromefatigue severity scalevisual analogue scale

Identifiers

PMID33114401
PMCPMC7712859
OpenAlexW3093590760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.